Steven Greer Goes After UFO Whistleblower Jason Sands (AND David Fravor)
UFO research and investigations have reached a pivotal moment in recent years, with prominent figures making competing claims about advanced aerospace technologies and their origins. The evolving narrative surrounding unexplained aerial phenomena has sparked intense debates within the UFO research community, particularly regarding witness testimonies and their interpretations.
The discourse between military personnel, researchers, and whistleblowers highlights the complex nature of UAP investigations. Different interpretations of the same events by various experts demonstrate the challenges in establishing definitive conclusions about these phenomena and their technological origins.
Key Takeaways
Multiple experts present conflicting interpretations of military UAP encounters
Whistleblower testimonies raise questions about advanced aerospace capabilities
Evidence interpretation varies significantly among prominent UFO researchers
Analyzing Dr. Steven Greer's Video Commentary
Review of Witness Account Details
Dr. Steven Greer assessed Jason Sans's appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience, expressing concerns about the scope of Sans's statements. Greer emphasized that Sans should limit his discussions to his direct experiences. The interaction between Sans and Greer included documented communications that established their prior contact.
Guidelines for Protected Information Handling
The proper process for whistleblowers centers on reporting only firsthand experiences and verified information. Three distinct categories of non-human intelligence exist:
Extraterrestrial beings: Non-hostile entities
Human-created craft: Associated with negative incidents
Inter-dimensional entities: Connected to historical mythological accounts
Technical Assessment of Advanced Craft
Dr. Greer discussed Commander David Fraver's F-18 Hornet encounter with an unidentified craft. The object exhibited unique movement patterns:
No conventional propulsion signatures
Absence of infrared heat emissions
Non-aerodynamic movement capabilities
The discussion included claims about Lockheed Skunk Works' involvement and subsequent communications with Fraver. Dr. Greer noted that advanced propulsion systems might be misidentified as non-human technology due to their unconventional characteristics.
Dr. Greer's Analysis of Jason Sans's Claims
Knowledge of Non-Human Intelligence
Dr. Greer emphasized the importance of whistleblowers limiting their statements to firsthand experiences. He noted that Sans lacked direct exposure to complex matters involving non-human entities.
The distinction between different types of non-human intelligence requires specific expertise. Three primary categories exist:
Extraterrestrial beings (non-hostile in nature)
Human-engineered craft and entities (responsible for negative encounters)
Interdimensional beings (can be manipulated through electromagnetic technology)
Minimizing False Threat Narratives
Dr. Greer identified a 70-year agenda to manufacture fear around non-human intelligence. He cautioned against spreading unverified information that could support this narrative.
The spread of misinformation creates challenges:
Mixing legitimate ET contact with artificial threats
Using advanced technology to simulate hostile encounters
Manufacturing evidence to support conflict scenarios
Dr. Greer stressed that statements without direct knowledge risk strengthening manufactured threats. His direct communication with Sans established the limits of Sans's direct experience with these topics.
Commander David Fraver's UFO Encounter Analysis
Commander David Fraver, a former F-18 Hornet pilot, encountered an unidentified flying object during a military flight operation. The object displayed extraordinary flight capabilities that defied conventional aerodynamic principles.
The craft exhibited movement patterns without typical propulsion signatures - no visible rockets, jets, or heat signatures detectable by infrared sensors. These characteristics initially led Fraver to conclude the object was of non-human origin.
Representatives from Lockheed Martin later contacted Fraver, claiming the object belonged to their advanced technology programs. This claim conflicts with Fraver's subsequent actions and statements.
In summer 2023, Fraver testified before Congress regarding his UFO encounter. His current position at an advanced aerospace company provides him unique insight into current technological capabilities.
The CIA distributed passive materials to Fraver suggesting the craft originated from Lockheed Martin's technology. These materials contained a mix of accurate and inaccurate information, following established intelligence community practices for information dissemination.
Fraver maintains his professional expertise and industry knowledge contradict claims of terrestrial origin for the object he encountered. His firsthand experience and technical background strengthen his position on the craft's unusual characteristics.
Key Flight Characteristics:
No conventional propulsion system
Absence of heat signatures
Movement patterns beyond known aerodynamic principles
No visible means of lift or thrust
Current Views on Unexplained Aerial Events
Jeremy Corbel's Recent Updates
Jeremy Corbel's interactions with Commander David Fraver reveal critical insights into information dissemination tactics. Corbel identifies specific instances of passage material - strategically leaked information within special access programs. These materials attempt to link UAP sightings to existing military contractors' technologies.
Navy Commander and Defense Industry Perspectives
Commander David Fraver's position at an advanced aerospace company provides unique insights into claimed technological capabilities. When presented with suggestions that Lockheed Martin possessed technology similar to observed UAPs, Fraver dismissed these claims based on his direct industry knowledge. His congressional testimony in Summer 2023 reinforces his stance on the technological gap between observed capabilities and known aerospace developments.
The CIA's reported attempts to shape UAP narratives through targeted information releases highlight ongoing efforts to influence public understanding. These releases often contain mixture of verifiable data and questionable technological claims.
Key Points:
Passage materials contain deliberate combinations of factual and misleading information
Commander Fraver maintains his original assessment of the technological capabilities
Industry position provides Fraver with current aerospace technology knowledge
Advanced Military Aircraft Reports
Lockheed Martin's Verification
A representative from Lockheed Martin reportedly reached out to confirm their ownership of specific advanced aerial technologies. The confirmation centered on classified aerospace developments within their Skunk Works division. This disclosure raises significant questions about the true nature of craft observed in military encounters.
Pilot Commander's Response
Commander David Fraver received communication through official channels suggesting certain observed phenomena were products of domestic technology programs. The CIA provided documentation indicating these aerial objects originated from U.S. defense contractors. Fraver, who currently works in the aerospace sector, expressed strong skepticism toward these claims. His position remains unchanged from his 2023 Congressional testimony, where he maintained these craft displayed capabilities beyond known technological limits.
The timing of this information sharing appears strategic, occurring through formal channels via passage material - a term used in Special Access Programs for controlled information distribution. The aerospace industry position suggests current technological capabilities do not align with the observed performance characteristics.
Key points of disagreement:
Origin of observed craft
Technical feasibility
Classification status
Performance capabilities
Timelines and Perspectives on UAP Disclosure
The complex dynamics between key figures in the UAP disclosure movement reveal significant disagreements about the nature of unexplained aerial phenomena. Dr. Steven Greer has publicly addressed Jason Sans's recent statements on The Joe Rogan Experience, expressing concerns about the discussion of certain topics.
Dr. Greer identifies three distinct categories of non-human intelligence (NHI): extraterrestrial beings described as non-hostile, human-manufactured craft with associated artificial beings, and extradimensional entities that can be influenced by electromagnetic technologies. He emphasizes the importance of whistleblowers limiting their statements to firsthand experiences.
The case of Commander David Fravor and the Tic Tac incident has sparked conflicting interpretations. Dr. Greer suggests Fravor has accepted Lockheed's claim of responsibility for the observed craft. Jeremy Corbell presents a different perspective, stating Fravor received what he calls "passage material" - strategically leaked information attempting to attribute the craft to human technology.
Commander Fravor's position at an aerospace company and his 2023 Congressional testimony stand in contrast to claims about his acceptance of terrestrial origins for the craft. The divergent interpretations between Dr. Greer and Corbell highlight the ongoing debate about UAP origins and disclosure efforts.
Several key players shape the current UAP narrative:
Military Witnesses: Active and former personnel providing firsthand accounts
Private Sector Experts: Aerospace industry professionals offering technical analysis
Government Agencies: Various organizations presenting different explanations
Independent Researchers: Investigators documenting and analyzing UAP events
The timing of these developments suggests heightened activity in UAP disclosure efforts through 2025. Continued testimony from military witnesses and government officials indicates sustained momentum in the investigation of these phenomena.
