Wait, What? Dr. Garry Nolan REVEALS "Clear Evidence" Of Aliens
Recent discussions on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) legislation and related disclosures have incited considerable attention within the aerospace and defense communities. During an insightful dialogue on the Good Trouble show, Stanford Professor Gary Nolan offered his perspective on the current state of UAP research, the implications of the Schumer Amendment, and the broader question of governmental disclosure. Nolan put forth a compelling viewpoint on the nature of disclosure, suggesting that formal acknowledgment of UAPs by the government may not be as imminent as some expect, implying that credible information has been historically forthcoming from sources outside governmental channels.
The debate on how and when UAP information should be released to the public has been enlivened by reports suggesting the potential dismissal of newly proposed advisory panels, which were intended to oversee the disclosure of UAP-related data. While the formal stance on disclosure remains shrouded in speculation, Nolan denotes that individuals and non-human intelligence (NHI) may not wait on formal announcements to reveal their experiences, as personal encounters and whistleblower testimonies have been contributing to an informal revelation process for years.
Key Takeaways
Professor Gary Nolan indicates formal government disclosure of UAPs may not happen soon, suggesting the truth is already accessible through recent developments.
Discussion centers on the current and future state of UAP-related legislation and advisory panels, including the uncertainty around the Schumer Amendment.
Nolan points out the long-standing informal disclosure through personal experiences and whistleblowers, differentiating between 'Little D' and 'Big D' disclosure.
UAP Regulatory Developments
Analysis of Recent Legislative Proposal
The proposed advisory board, commonly referenced as the Schumer Amendment, which was expected to be integrated into the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2024, is now rumored to possibly be dismissed. This initiative aimed to establish a panel tasked with analyzing a wealth of UAP-related data to determine which information should be released to the public and the methodology of such disclosures.
Composition and Purpose: The panel would consist of experts scrutinizing UAP-related data.
Disclosure Protocols: Set deadlines and frameworks for releasing information.
Authority Aspects: Powers to requisition materials from private companies, including potential non-human technology.
Expected Release Schedule and Prospects
Timeline projections for disclosure have been set with the intention to guide the release of UAP information. Yet there are suggestions that any government-led revelations may not materialize in the near future, further than what has already been disseminated.
Immediate Outlook: Government disclosure unlikely to advance shortly.
Alternate Channels: Instances of NHI self-disclosure over millennia.
Governmental Position in Information Release
The government's approach to UAP-related information sharing has been cautious, with limited data released to date. The ongoing debate centers on whether the government or non-human intelligence (NHI) will be the primary source of disclosure.
Current State: The government has shared as much as it deems feasible.
Public Analysis: Independent interpretation of recent events viewed as subtle disclosures.
Comparison: Contrasting 'Little D' self-disclosure by NHI and 'Big D' formal government announcements.
Insights from Academic Gary Nolan
Recognizing Official Acknowledgement and Public Sentiment
Professor Nolan indicated a recent event as an implicit confirmation by the authorities on the topic at hand. This occurrence was equated to a child caught with his hand in a cookie jar still denying taking any cookies despite the obvious. In essence, the Professor suggests the evidence is conspicuous, and one should discern the truth from the presented scenario.
Historical Instances of Non-Human Intelligence Encounters
Nolan mentions that non-human intelligence (NHI) has been engaging with humanity for millennia, which he perceives as an ongoing form of self-disclosure by these entities. This contrasts to what could be considered "official" disclosure. He underscores the longstanding, informal process through which NHIs have made their presence known, independent of any government admission.
Prospects of Official Government Revelation
According to Professor Nolan, it is unlikely that comprehensive disclosure concerning the undisclosed phenomena will emanate from government channels anytime soon. The conversation touched upon an amendment, which, despite its pending status, could potentially structure how details about these events are shared with the public. Nolan illustrates a sense of complacency without governmental validation and emphasizes individuals' ability to draw conclusions from patterns and whistleblowers' testimonies without an official statement.
Table: Summary of Key Points Discussed by Professor Nolan
Topic Description Government Admission A recent event suggests an implicit acknowledgment by officials reguarding non-human intelligence. NHI History NHIs have been revealing themselves for thousands of years, independent of any formal disclosure. Disclosure Expectations Official comprehensive disclosure from the government is unlikely in the near future.
Examining the Future of Proposed UAP Policy Changes
Potential Decline of the Proposed Legislation
The buzz surrounding the suggested policy change, popularly dubbed the Schumer Amendment, is rife with speculation about its impending rejection. Sources hint at the legislative proposal, originally aimed at creating an advisory panel within the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2024 to oversee UAP-related disclosures, encountering significant pushback. Rumors indicate that this directive, which included provisions for government access to privately held aerospace assets, may not take effect.
Reasons for Rejection:
Duplication of efforts with other programs
Financial constraints
Political maneuvering
Economic Implications
The financial aspect of the proposed amendment is minimal relative to the broader fiscal landscape. The advisory panel's proposed budget is notably modest, amounting to just a few million dollars. The concern isn’t the magnitude of the funds but rather the efficiency of allocation, with suggestions that existing initiatives might render the new proposal redundant.
Concern Details Budget Allocation A comparison with current funding in similar areas. Fiscal Responsibility Debate over the necessity of additional expenditure given current resources.
Influence of Aerospace Sector Advocacy
Lobbying by major aerospace corporations may be a pivotal factor in the amendment's trajectory. The interplay between industry interests and political decision-making appears to have propelled a senior political figure to pronounce the proposed adjustment as effectively terminated.
Key Points:
Industry Lobbying: Aerospace corporations exerting influence on policy.
Legislative Impact: Communication between leading political figures suggesting a shift in support.
Budgetary Justification: Questions arising about the need for a new panel amid other existing programs.
These elements coalesce to shape the pending legislative developments concerning UAP information disclosure and governmental oversight.
Indications of Confirmation
Informal Versus Formal Recognition
Informal recognition, often referred to as "Little D" disclosure, involves the spontaneous unveiling of non-human intelligence (NHI) without reliance on official channels. This phenomenon has manifested globally through individual experiences and anecdotal accounts spanning millennia. Formal acknowledgment, or "Big D" disclosure, would entail an official statement by governmental bodies confirming the existence of such phenomena, providing substantive information at their disposal.
Declarations by Renowned Individuals
Noteworthy figures have publicized their perspectives on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and the associated legislative efforts. A case in point is the suggested amendment—widely discussed but not yet cemented—which proposes the creation of an advisory panel tasked with analyzing UAP data and advising on its release to the public.
Unquestionable Signs of Extraterrestrial Presence
Concrete instances pointing to extraterrestrial life have been documented, though they remain non-public. Such evidence may include visual materials or accounts that definitively showcase the existence of life forms beyond human understanding. Direct and tangible signifiers fall under this category, bolstering the case for otherworldly intelligence interacting with our planet.
Alternative Strategies for Unveiling Information
Lack of Immediate Alternative Strategy
With no evident secondary approach to revealing information on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), there seems to be a reliance on the current trajectory without clear alternatives at this time. The expectation to continue on this path persists, coupled with the possibility of unforeseen disclosures stemming from internal sources breaking non-disclosure agreements.
Current Approach: Persistence with the present strategy without deviation.
Potential Internal Disclosure:
Insider Action: An individual within the establishment may choose to divulge information.
Inadvertent Release: Circumstances leading to the accidental unveiling of information.
Theoretical Possibilities for Disclosure
Alternative pathways for disclosure could materialize through various avenues outside of formal government announcements. The concept of smaller, individual 'disclosures' suggests a historical pattern of non-human intelligence revealing itself without reliance on official narratives.
Self-Disclosure by Non-Human Intelligence: An ongoing phenomenon for millennia, with incidents widely reported and experiences shared by individuals globally.
Whistleblowers and Eyewitnesses:
Informants: Those with access to privileged information choosing to come forward.
Public Claims: Accounts from individuals and collective experiences suggesting a pattern of subtle disclosures.
Public Scrutiny and Analysis:
Media and Research Studies: Scrutinizing available evidence through various multimedia sources and scholarly studies may offer indirect insights.
Legislative Uncertainty: Proposed amendments and initiatives aimed at official disclosures are subject to political processes, which may lead to their discontinuation.
Source Links
FULL Garry Nolan Interview On 'The Good Trouble Show': https://www.youtube.com/live/ZVECfCYpS90?si=t983PMQ3_WxmL-bO
Garry Nolan Clip 1:https://x.com/fringe_think/status/1728941679175188498?s=20
Garry Nolan Clip 2: https://x.com/andadsson/status/1728887537228484683?s=20
Garry Nolan Clip 3: https://x.com/UAPJames/status/1728899682271887549?s=20
Tweet About Garry Nolan: https://x.com/TheUfoJoe/status/1728909399232843898?s=20
