UAP Disclosure Act GUTTED By Republicans

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for the year 2024 has recently been released, generating significant discussion in the defense and intelligence communities concerning Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). A particular focus has been on the amendment process regarding UAP transparency and disclosure, which has experienced notable changes. The original amendment, initially introduced with strong support, faced substantial revisions during the legislative process, stripping away some of the key provisions that advocates had hoped for.

Despite these setbacks, there are elements within the NDAA that have withstood the legislative process and may serve as foundations for progress in UAP research and transparency. Notable measures that remain include requirements for certain UAP programs to be disclosed to Congressional leadership, as well as the transfer and review of UAP records for potential public disclosure. While some essential components were omitted, the act still represents a measured step forward in the struggle for greater openness regarding UAPs. Many advocates view this progression as a significant although incremental victory, emphasizing the importance of perseverance and continued effort in the landscape of UAP disclosure.

Key Takeaways

  • The 2024 NDAA includes UAP disclosure measures, reflecting a cautious advancement in transparency.

  • Key provisions regarding UAP record transfers and disclosures now form part of the legislation.

  • Despite exclusions and revisions, the NDAA represents a forward step in the effort for UAP openness.

Overview of NDAA and UAP Amendment

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for the fiscal year 2024, a crucial legislative package for defense expenditures and policy measures, includes provisions specific to Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). Despite expectations for a comprehensive inclusion of UAP-related amendments, significant portions were omitted during the legislative process.

  • Section 105 mandates the Department of Defense (DoD) to pass a comprehensive financial audit by 2028.

  • The 1687 Gillibrand Amendment restricts the allocation of funds to any UAP endeavors unless such actions are communicated to the Congressional leadership and the Intelligence and Armed Services Committees.

  • Under Section 1841, the Schumer-Rounds adds a directive for the establishment of a UAP record archive within the National Archives.

    • Oversight: Administered collectively by the Senate Homeland Security, Armed Services, and Intelligence Committees, along with their counterparts in the House of Representatives.

Documentation and Disclosure:

  • Section 1842 specifies that all government entities holding UAP documentation must identify and forward these records to the National Archives.

  • Disclosure Exceptions: While records are to be fully disclosed within 25 years of their creation, the President retains power to prevent disclosure if it is deemed that release would harm national security interests.

In accordance with Section 1843, additional conditions under which UAP records may be withheld include instances of severe detriment to national security or disclosure of confidential sources and methods.

  • Sections 7343 and 7601-7606 present broadly defined adjustments to classification statutes, which may influence the confidentiality surrounding UAP information.

  • Sections 7801-7804 tackle assistance measures for individuals experiencing anomalous health occurrences, which may have connections to UAP or Havana Syndrome.

Observations and Outlook:

  • The law now mandates that federal entities prioritize the submission of records pertaining to non-human intelligence.

  • Although the legislation lacks provisions for an independent review panel, imminent domain authority, or a controlled disclosure process, it is seen as progress toward greater transparency.

Given the multifaceted nature of Sections 1841-1850, further analysis and interpretation is anticipated in the future. The introduction of terminology such as "unidentified anomalous phenomena" in official legislation signifies meaningful progress regarding the subject of UAP. The expectation remains that gradual changes will continue to shape future legislation, moving toward greater transparency over time.

Overview of UAP Provisions in National Defense Legislation

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2024 includes specific provisions concerning Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). Despite certain expected amendments being absent, the final version still encompasses measures related to UAP. Notably:

  • Section 105: This section mandates the Department of Defense (DoD) to complete an exhaustive financial audit by the year 2028.

  • Section 1687 (Gillibrand Amendment): Explicitly prohibits the allocation of funds to UAP-centric projects unless these are fully disclosed to the congressional leadership and the appropriate intelligence and armed services committees. This includes efforts related to Identified Anomalous Aerial Systems (IAAS).

  • Section 1841: Outlines the procedure for compiling UAP records into the National Archives. Oversight is provisioned to various committees, including Senate Homeland Security, Armed Services, and Intelligence Committees, in conjunction with House Oversight, Armed Services, and Intelligence Committees.

  • Section 1842: Stipulates that each government office in possession of UAP documents must identify and transfer them to the National Archives. While there is no established review board, a stipulation requires that each document be released in full within a 25-year timeframe from its creation unless the President intervenes citing identifiable harm to national security outweighing public interest.

  • Section 1843: Specifies circumstances under which certain records may be withheld, especially if their disclosure would cause grave harm to national security or expose sensitive intelligence sources and methods.

Further, the NDAA includes provisions for a comprehensive UAP records collection, mandating the transfer of such records for review and potential release, barring specific authorized grounds for postponing disclosure. Noteworthy is the absence of provisions that would establish an independent review board, grant eminent domain authority, or create a controlled disclosure process.

Particular interest has been shown in the inclusion of language regarding non-human intelligence in federal documentation. Federal agencies will be prioritized to turn over records relating to non-human intelligence as the President is anticipated to approve these legislative terms.

Additionally, sections 7601-7606 detail intricate reforms to existing classification laws which may influence the secrecy around UAP matters, pending further examination. Sections 7801-7804 relate to assistance for individuals experiencing anomalous health incidents potentially connected to UAP or Havana Syndrome.

Although initially viewed as a diminished version without particular desired amendments, the NDAA for 2024 signifies progressive steps toward transparency and oversight in the matter of UAPs. Considering the NDAA’s annual review, there is an opportunity for ongoing improvements and advocacy in this area.

Detailed Analysis of UAP Disclosure Provisions

Audit Compliance for the Department of Defense by 2028

Under the National Defense Authorization Act, the Department of Defense is mandated to achieve a complete and clean financial audit by the year 2028. This initiative is critical to ensure financial accountability and transparency within the department.

Congressional Oversight on UAP Expenditure

An amendment restricts the allocation of funds to Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) projects without formal disclosure to key congressional committees including Intelligence and Armed Services. This is designed to foster transparency and maintain checks and balances over UAP-related expenditures.

Cataloging Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in National Repositories

A section of the legislation directs for the creation of a UAP record archive within the National Archives. These records will be under the jurisdiction of several Senate and House committees, ensuring legislative oversight.

Identification Protocol for UAP Documentation

This part instructs each government entity in possession of UAP records to identify and designate such documentation for transfer to the National Archives. This process must be thorough to ensure all relevant UAP records are included in the national collection.

Conditions for Withholding UAP Documentation

This section outlines specific circumstances under which UAP documentation may be exempt from public disclosure. If a record’s release is deemed to cause significant harm to national security and outweighs public interest, withholding criteria may be applied, subject to presidential certification.

These refinements in the UAP disclosure process reflect incremental steps aimed at increasing transparency while balancing national security concerns. The ongoing conversation within the legislative framework echoes a commitment to revisit and revise these policies annually, suggesting potential for further developments in future sessions.

Consequences of Omitted Sections

The recent passing of the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act saw notable omissions in its final version. Despite expectations, several key amendments targeting Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) did not make it into the bill. Among these, the provisions for an independent audit review authority, the eminent domain for relevant materials, and the capability for issuing subpoenas were removed.

The legislation did also provide new regulations. One such directive, under Section 105, mandates that the Department of Defense must secure a clean audit by 2028. While some progress is evident, the absence of significant components initially anticipated raises concerns regarding the thoroughness and oversight of UAP programs and disclosure.

Details on Funding Provisions and Restrictions

  • Section 1687: This provision explicitly bars the allocation of funds to any UAP endeavors unless such actions are reported to the Congressional leadership as well as to the Intelligence and Armed Services committees.

  • Section 1841: This clause stipulates a new requirement ensuring that UAP records are amalgamated in the National Archives. Moreover, a series of committees including the Senate Homeland Security, Armed Services, and Intelligence, along with House Oversight, have been granted supervisory roles.

Disclosure and Confidentiality

Section 1842 commands a comprehensive identification of UAP files by government offices and their subsequent forward to the National Archives. Yet, the catch here lies in the provision allowing the president to forestall the disclosure of documents for up to 25 years, contingent upon a potential risk to national security surpassing public interest.

On Secrecy and Accountability

  • Section 1843: This addition describes conditions under which information may be withheld, including when disclosure could result in severe harm to national security, or if it would disclose sensitive sources and methods.

  • Sections 7601-7606: Broadly reform the classification laws which may indirectly affect the secrecy surrounding UAP information.

Health Incidents and Anomalous Phenomena

  • Sections 7801-7804: These concern aid to individuals affected by abnormal health incidents potentially linked to UAP or related syndromes. More investigation on these provisions is necessary to understand their full implications.

The bill, while falling short of many expectations, also signals incremental progress by requiring federal agencies to prioritize records related to non-human intelligence. While the provisions to set up an independent review board along with a structured disclosure process were excluded, the inclusion of terms such as "unidentified anomalous phenomena" and "non-human intelligence" indicates a gradual shift in addressing UAPs more formally within governmental agendas. The law fortifies the infrastructure for future advances by enabling the collation of UAP records within the National Archives, thus laying foundations for the potential unraveling of long-standing secrecy.

Grounds for Optimism in Light of Recent Developments

The passage of the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has sparked a mixture of reactions, but there are elements that provide a steadfast sense of hope. The act mandates the Department of Defense to secure a clean audit by 2028—an essential stride towards transparency.

Despite certain desired elements being absent, such as eminent domain and the power to subpoena, the Act has made notable progressions. Key provisions include:

Budget Oversight and Accountability

  • Restriction on UAP Expenditure: The use of funds for Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) projects must be disclosed to the leadership of Congress as well as Intelligence and Armed Services committees.

Information Accessibility and Preservation

  • National Record Collection Initiation: Records pertaining to UAPs are directed for assimilation and need to be identified by governmental offices and forwarded to the National Archives.

Timeline for Disclosure:

  • Records must be made fully public within 25 years of their creation, barring any national security concerns confirmed by presidential authority.

Subsequent Legislation Reiteration:

  • Section 7343 echoes the conditions of Section 1687, further underlining the limitations imposed on the utilization of allocated funds for UAP programs without appropriate reporting to committees of Congress.

Classification and Secrecy Reform

  • Broader Classification Reforms: Newly added sections in the Act promise to shape the future of classification and potentially impact the secrecy surrounding UAP-related information.

Support for Anomaly Affected Individuals:

  • Provisions for Anomalous Health Incidents: Comprising individuals potentially affected by UAPs or incidents similar to the Havana Syndrome, the Act demands more extensive analysis.

Emphasis on New Terminology:

  • Integration of Progressive Language: It's notable that terms like "non-human intelligence" and "unidentified anomalous phenomena" are now officially recognized and included in federal legislation.

Insightful Projections

Looking forward, the provisions set today can be built upon in subsequent years. With federal agencies obliged to prioritize the release of records concerning non-human intelligence, ground-breaking information could be on the horizon. The NDAA's annual revision ensures that there is always an opportunity to improve and solidify the transparency and accountability sought by many.

The establishment of a specific category for unidentified anomalous phenomena within the National Archives is a seminal moment. As the government acknowledges the significance of UAPs formally, this could be the inception of a new era of enlightenment and understanding.

Despite obstacles and shortcomings, the landscape is slowly changing. The incremental steps being taken today may lay the groundwork for more comprehensive reforms in the future. Progress, however small, is still progress, contributing to a broader project of disclosure.

Further Evaluation Needed

The recent passage of the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act included various provisions necessitating additional scrutiny. Despite the omission of key elements such as the authority to assert eminent domain and a review board with subpoena power, several sections have been incorporated that suggest incremental progress.

Section 105 sets a deadline for the Department of Defense to secure a clean financial audit by 2028.

Section 1687, also known as the Gillibrand Amendment, puts restrictions on the allocation of funds for unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) programs. It stipulates that program details must be disclosed to the congressional leadership and relevant committees, including both Intelligence and Armed Services Committees.

Section 1841, emphasizing transparency, mandates a compilation of UAP records in the National Archives. This section also gives oversight rights to certain Senate and House committees.

Section 1842 expands on the transparency effort by requiring government offices possessing UAP records to identify and forward them to the National Archives for potential public disclosure. However, unless the President deems disclosure a threat to national security, these records should be disclosed fully within 25 years of their creation date.

Sections 1841–1843 include specific cases where disclosing UAP records might be postponed if the information could cause severe harm to national security.

The text suggests a broader strategy aimed not merely at the immediate release of information but at initiating a long-term, incremental approach to UAP transparency.

Section 7343 echoes the directions found in Section 1687 regarding the prohibition of fund usage on certain UAP programs.

Sections 7601–7606 introduce comprehensive classification reforms, which may impact UAP secrecy and call for a closer look to understand the implications fully.

Section 7801–7804 address assistance for individuals affected by unexplained health incidents, potentially linked to UAP or the so-called Havana Syndrome.

In summary, the enacted provisions require thorough analysis to comprehend their scope and the mechanisms implied. While these advances might not encompass all desired reforms, they initiate critical steps toward greater transparency and may influence the handling of UAP-related matters in the forthcoming years.

Expanded Revisions and Anticipated Effects

Financial Restraints on Specific Defense Initiatives

In accordance with the revised policies, there's now a directive preventing the allotment of funds to certain defense projects pertaining to Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) unless there's full disclosure to pivotal congressional figures and committees. Detailed disclosure to both Intelligence and Armed Services Committees is mandated, ensuring a higher degree of oversight.

Overhaul of Classification Guidelines

Broadly, the classification system is undergoing significant restructuring. These revisions aim to address issues surrounding the secrecy of UAP-related information. These measures may indirectly influence the accessibility of information about UAP by altering existing classification protocols. Detailed examination is needed to determine the full extent of these modifications.

Assistance for Anomalous Health Incidents

New provisions have been introduced to provide assistance to individuals affected by atypical health occurrences, which could potentially be linked to UAPs or events akin to the Havana Syndrome. These measures outline the government's role in response to such health incidents, suggesting a more structured approach to this type of incidents.

Refinement of Whistleblower Protocol Standards

Although proposed reforms to the whistleblower process attentive to intelligence community have been omitted, this does not negate the importance of providing transparent and protected channels for whistleblowers. Ensuring that those who come forward with sensitive information are safeguarded remains a critical aspect of maintaining integrity within the defense framework.

In summary, despite some setbacks, the retained sections of the amendment demonstrate a commitment to transparency and reform, albeit with the acknowledgment that such processes are iterative and require continual adjustment and scrutiny.

Understanding the Impact of Revised UAP Measures in the 2024 Defense Legislation

The latest iteration of the defense annual budget legislation, known specifically as the National Defense Authorization Act, has experienced significant revisions to its Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) related content. Notably, specific amendments had been anticipated but were ultimately excluded from the final text.

The Department of Defense is mandated by Section 105 to achieve a thorough audit by the year 2028. Notably absent from the legislation are key elements such as the ability to exercise eminent domain, the establishment of a specialized review board, and the authority to issue subpoenas.

Funds are restricted from being allocated to any UAP-related program by Section 1687, known as the Gillibrand Amendment, unless they are disclosed to the leadership of Congress and the intelligence and armed services committees. This also encompasses the Integrated Aerial Defense System (IADS) framework.

Sections 1841 to 1843 outline the establishment of a unified collection of UAP records within the National Archives. The responsibility to oversee these records falls upon several senate and house committees, which include the Senate Homeland Security, Armed Services, and Intelligence Committees, along with the House Oversight, Armed Services, and Intelligence Committees.

These sections also dictate that all government offices with UAP records must identify and transfer their records to the National Archives. A critical stipulation in this process is that documents must be made fully available within 25 years of their origination, with the exception that the President can exempt records if public disclosure is deemed a threat to national security that exceeds the public interest.

Key Points in the Revised UAP Legislative Content:

  • Audit Requirements: By 2028, undertake a complete audit of the Department of Defense. (Section 105)

  • Exclusion of Major Components: Omitted are eminent domain, review board, and subpoena power.

  • Gillibrand Amendment: Usage of funds for UAP efforts curtailed without apprising Congress and pertinent committees. (Section 1687)

  • Establishment of UAP Records Collection: Centralized UAP records to be held in the National Archives, with mandatory oversight by select Congressional committees. (Sections 1841-1843)

  • Information Disclosure Mandates: All government-held UAP records to be identified and disclosed after 25 years, barring presidential veto due to national security concerns.

The absence of provisions for an independent review board or a controlled disclosure process is noteworthy; however, the requirement for all government offices to contribute UAP records to a national collection remains in place.

Moreover, Sections 7343 and 7601 to 7606 introduce broad reforms, potentially altering aspects of UAP secrecy. Further examination of these sections will be necessary to determine their full implications.

Sections 7801 to 7804 address aid for individuals suffering anomalous health incidents potentially related to UAPs or phenomena akin to the Havana Syndrome.

In conclusion, the defense budget legislation for 2024 reflects modifications in UAP disclosure policy, with some elements fostering transparency while others limit it. Despite setbacks, incremental progress is evident in this ongoing endeavor to address UAP secrecy.

Source Links

Tweet Summary Of UAP Language in NDAA: https://x.com/CuriousNHI/status/1732625762442752095?s=20

PDF Copies Of NDAA With UAP Language (Includes FULL NDAA): https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/uap-language-in-the-compromised-national-defense-authorization-act-for-fiscal-year-2024/

Tweet In Support: https://x.com/MvonRen/status/1732624991987106159?s=20

Original UAP Amendment: https://www.declassifyuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/FY24-IAA-UAP-portion-extract.pdf

Previous
Previous

Ashton Forbes May Be The Hoaxer Behind The MH370 ‘UFO’ Videos

Next
Next

Daniel Sheehan Says US Holding “Diabolical Alien” Prisoner