Steven Greer's SHOCKING Allegations Against Dr. Garry Nolan
The mysterious Atacama skeleton discovered in Chile sparked significant scientific debate and conflicting interpretations among researchers. The tiny six-inch specimen, with its unusual physical characteristics and bone structure, became the center of extensive genetic analysis and medical examination.
Dr. Steven Greer and Dr. Gary Nolan's collaboration on studying this unique specimen led to divergent conclusions and subsequent disagreements. The initial scientific investigation focused on determining the origin and nature of the skeleton, which displayed distinctive features including an enlarged cranial vault and atypical bone development patterns.
Key Takeaways
Scientific analysis of the Atacama skeleton revealed conflicting interpretations between researchers
Advanced genetic testing and bone structure examination produced contradictory conclusions
The investigation sparked debate about research integrity and methodology in unusual specimen analysis
Scientific Disagreements Surrounding Research
Personal Conflicts Between Two Scientists
Dr. Steven Greer made several serious accusations against Stanford Professor Gary Nolan regarding their collaborative research. The dispute centers on genetic samples from small humanoid specimens discovered in Chile's Atacama region. A significant point of tension emerged when Dr. Nolan received $3.4 million in Pentagon funding after analyzing the specimens.
The research relationship between the two scientists deteriorated after Dr. Nolan's analysis concluded the specimens were human. Dr. Greer claims this finding contradicts observations from other experts who noted growth plates consistent with a six-year-old in a six-inch tall specimen.
Research Integrity Questions
Dr. Greer raised concerns about the validity of Dr. Nolan's published findings, claiming multiple geneticists identified issues with the data. The specimens exhibited unusual characteristics:
Height: Approximately 6 inches tall
Growth plates: Equivalent to a 6-year-old human
Cranial features: Skull vault three times larger than human proportions
Rib count: 10 ribs instead of the typical human 12
Dr. Nolan's initial assessment in documentary footage noted these anomalies but his final published conclusions classified the specimens as human. The shift in conclusions led to accusations of data manipulation and questions about the influence of military funding on research outcomes.
Dr. Nolan maintains his research followed proper scientific protocols, involving a team of 11 people including Stanford scientists and Ro Diagnostics. His analysis confirmed 100% human DNA in the specimens.
Discovery and Investigation History
Initial Research on Atacama Specimen
A small humanoid specimen, approximately 6 inches tall, was discovered in Chile's Atacama Desert. The specimen displayed unusual physical characteristics, including a large cranial vault nearly three times the size of a typical human skull. Dr. Lochman's initial examination noted the specimen's atypical head shape and skull formation. The bone structure exhibited normal spine and extremity proportions but contained only 10 ribs instead of the typical human count of 12.
Growth plate analysis indicated the specimen was equivalent to a 6-8 year old human, despite its diminutive size. Multiple UFO sightings and reports of small creatures approximately 1.5 feet tall were documented in the Atacama region where the specimen was found.
Scientific Analysis Request and Results
In 2012, Dr. Nolan received genetic samples for analysis at Stanford University. The research team consisted of approximately 11 people, including Stanford scientists and Ro Diagnostics. Initial hypotheses considered various possibilities, including non-human origins.
The Pentagon provided $3.4 million in funding after the sample submission. The published analysis concluded the specimen was human with deformities, though this conclusion faced criticism from other geneticists who questioned the data's validity.
A key point of scientific disagreement centered on the specimen's bone malformations. While some experts cited the global nature of the anomalies and growth plates as inconsistent with known human disorders, others maintained the features aligned with human genetic variations.
Research Analysis and Impact Assessment
Financial Allegations Against the Principal Investigator
The investigation uncovered claims of a $3.4 million Pentagon funding allocation to Dr. Nolan following the genetic sample analysis. The funding coincided with subsequent contracts involving intelligence community research focused on UAP-related injuries. These financial arrangements raised questions about potential conflicts of interest in the research process.
Scientific Data Interpretation Disputes
Top geneticists expressed significant disagreements with the published findings. The bone structure analysis revealed growth plates consistent with a 6-year-old human, despite the specimen measuring only 6 inches in height. The specimen displayed several unique characteristics:
10 ribs instead of the typical human 12
Enlarged cranial vault (3x human size)
Mid-face hypoplasia
Underdeveloped jaw
The initial examinations indicated the specimen did not match known medical disorders or syndromes. These observations sparked debate about its classification within existing scientific frameworks.
Publication Results and Implications
The final published report classified the specimen as a deformed human fetus. This conclusion faced criticism from bone malformation specialists, who noted inconsistencies with this determination. The DNA sequencing process, conducted by a team of 11 researchers including Stanford scientists and Ro Diagnostics, definitively identified the specimen as human. This finding contradicted earlier hypotheses about potential non-human origins.
Key findings from the genetic analysis:
100% human DNA confirmation
Novel mutations linked to dysplasia
Complete genome sequencing results
The research sparked disagreements between team members regarding methodology and interpretation of results.
Medical Expert's Analysis
Research Methodology Concerns
Genetic analyses of the Chilean skeletal specimen revealed significant discrepancies between initial observations and published findings. The research process faced challenges in maintaining scientific rigor and consistent methodologies. The specimen's bone density measurements and growth plate analyses indicated development equivalent to a 6-8 year old human, despite its 6-inch stature.
Research Integrity Issues
The $3.4 million Pentagon funding coincided with significant alterations in the research findings. The specimen's genetic data underwent modifications that deviated from original observations. Leading geneticists identified inconsistencies in the published data that raised questions about research authenticity.
Key Disputed Findings:
Growth plate measurements
Bone structure analyses
Genetic sequencing results
Medical Investigation Irregularities
The UAP injury research program presents misleading information about incident causes and effects. Engineering signatures point to manufactured origins rather than extraterrestrial sources. The specimen exhibited unique characteristics:
10 ribs versus typical human 12
Enlarged cranial structure
Atypical jaw development
Mid-face structural variations
Local witnesses reported sightings of similar 18-inch adult specimens in the Atacama region. Multiple bone specialists confirmed the specimen did not match known human skeletal disorders or growth abnormalities.
Critical Documentary Analysis
Physical Characteristics of the Entity
The anatomical specimen stands at approximately 6 inches tall, displaying unique skeletal features. Multiple growth plates indicate an age equivalent to a 6-8 year old human. The cranial structure exhibits a vault three times larger than typical human proportions. The skeletal framework includes only 10 ribs, compared to the standard 12 in humans.
The specimen's bone density measurements reveal mature development patterns. Its skeletal proportions maintain normalcy in the spine and extremities. Notable distinctions include significant mid-face reduction and an underdeveloped jaw structure.
Scientific Evaluations and Professional Insights
Initial analyses at Stanford University focused on the specimen's distinctive cranial features. The research team noted its atypical eye socket formation and disproportionate head size.
Dr. Gary Nolan led genetic testing procedures at Stanford, collaborating with a team of 11 researchers. The investigation culminated in comprehensive DNA sequencing, determining the specimen's human origin.
A professional bone specialist evaluated the growth patterns, emphasizing the specimen's anomalous characteristics. The expert noted the absence of typical syndrome markers, setting it apart from documented skeletal disorders.
Research Funding Details:
Pentagon contribution: $3.4 million
Purpose: UAP injury investigation
Timeline: Post-initial specimen analysis
The scientific community remains divided on the interpretation of findings. Independent geneticists have expressed concerns regarding data analysis methods and conclusions.
Public Response and Media Coverage
Credibility Investigations and Analysis
Dr. Steven Greer raised serious concerns about the analysis of small humanoid remains from the Atacama region. He alleged that after providing genetic samples for testing, the research direction shifted due to external funding influences. The specific claim centers on a $3.4 million Pentagon grant that allegedly affected the study's outcomes. The genetic analysis initially suggested distinctive features, including growth plates consistent with a six-year-old human despite the specimen being only 6 inches tall.
The examination noted several anatomical anomalies:
Enlarged cranial vault (3x human size)
Unique eye socket structure
Only 10 ribs instead of the typical 12
Abnormal size-to-age ratio
Media Interview Developments
The Danny Jones podcast highlighted significant disagreements between key researchers. Several leading geneticists have questioned the published findings' accuracy. The initial research team documented specific physical characteristics that appeared inconsistent with known human disorders or syndromes.
Key points of contention include:
Growth plate analysis indicating a 6-8 year age range
Specimen survival questions in historical context
Mid-face hypoplasia observations
Bone density measurements
The preliminary examinations generated significant interest due to:
Unusual skeletal proportions
Distinctive cranial features
Unexpected bone development patterns
The research team's early observations noted anatomical features that deviated from typical human development patterns, sparking extensive scientific discussion and debate.
Scientific Refutations by Dr. Gary Nolan
Interview with Lex Fridman
Dr. Gary Nolan addressed claims about the Atacama skeleton during his appearance on the Lex Fridman podcast. He discussed his scientific analysis of the specimen, working with a team of 11 people, including Stanford scientists and Ro Diagnostics. The research process involved DNA sequencing conducted primarily by students under professional guidance.
Initially, Dr. Nolan hypothesized the specimen might be a monkey. His team embarked on a thorough scientific investigation to determine its origin and nature.
Scientific Analysis and Results
The research team conducted comprehensive genetic testing and anatomical studies of the Atacama specimen. Their findings revealed several distinctive characteristics:
Physical Features:
6 inches in height
Enlarged cranial vault
Underdeveloped jaw
10 ribs instead of the typical 12
Growth plates indicating 6-8 years of age
Dr. Nolan's research definitively determined the specimen was human, identifying specific mutations linked to dysplasia. The investigation followed standard scientific protocols and peer review processes.
The research involved:
Whole genome sequencing
Bone density analysis
Growth plate examination
Skeletal structure assessment
Dr. Nolan and his team published their findings in a scientific paper titled "Whole Genome Sequencing of Atacama Skeleton Shows Novel Mutations Linked with Dysplasia."
