NEW Witness Speaks Out About “Jellyfish UFO" Video
In a recent development concerning the elusive Jellyfish UFO phenomenon, a fresh account has emerged, providing alternative details to the narrative initially presented by Jeremy Corbell. The additional witness, who previously remained undisclosed, has claimed familiarity with the event, citing his service at the same military base in Iraq where the original footage was captured. His insights offer a nuanced perspective, suggesting discrepancies between his observations and those previously reported. The conversation revolving around these mysterious sightings has been invigorated by this witness's podcast appearance, where he delineates his experience, noting fluctuations in his recounting that may shed new light on this enigmatic occurrence.
Analyzing the Jellyfish UFO's traits and behaviors, particular attention has been drawn to its unusual thermal signatures—depicted as alternating between extremes of heat and cold—and its interaction with military targeting systems, which reportedly failed to lock onto the object. Moreover, discussions have encapsulated the baffling actions of the UFO, encompassing mysterious water entries and rapid egressions, hinting at unprecedented capabilities. The situation's complexity is accentuated by testimony regarding immediate cessation of video feeds by involved nations, raising questions about potential secrecy and international stakes in the encounter.
Key Takeaways
A new witness offers details contradicting previous Jellyfish UFO reports, while acknowledging changes in his own story.
The UFO displayed exceptional characteristics, such as heat fluctuations, and evaded advanced military targeting systems.
The incident involves secrecy, with international implications and ties to historic UFO sightings at nuclear sites.
Jeremy Corbell's Aerial Anomaly Footage Analysis
Jeremy Corbell recently publicized an intriguing video appearing to show an unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) resembling a jellyfish. Its characteristics have sparked a fervent debate within the UAP community. The footage in question demonstrates the anomaly’s heat signature shifting between extremes, as captured by a military weapon sight that, notably, malfunctioned when attempting to lock onto the object. Eyewitnesses directly involved in the incident have verified the event's occurrence.
Corbell’s account details that the anomaly exhibited rigid, scale-like features that presumably would be visible only within the thermal spectrum, suggesting its potential threat level. The consequent actions by multiple nations to immediately terminate the video feeds heightened suspicions. Adding to the enigma, the entity was observed making an abrupt stop over a body of water before descending into it without altering its rigid structure. Corbell emphasizes a peculiar 17-minute interlude, after which the object abruptly reemerged and ascended at a 45-degree angle, which he drew parallels to past incursions at nuclear facilities.
After the video gained prominence, Michael Sinnosi, a Marine veteran and former intelligence tactical controller at the base where the video originated, responded to clarify certain aspects of the encounter. Sinnosi disclosed the local personnel's nickname for the anomaly--the 'spaghetti monster'--due to its unusual appearance when captured by the aerostatic monitoring systems. However, Sinnosi countered that he personally did not witness the entity descending into the water, a detail that diverges from Corbell’s narrative. Instead, Sinnosi described the object continuing its traversal until it faded into the distance, remaining unresolved as to whether it submerged in the adjacent Lake Habbaniyah before ultimately vanishing from sight.
New Evidence Surfaces
Inconsistent Narratives
Aspect Jeremy Corell's Account Witness Account Discrepancies Object Interaction with Water Descends stiffly into water, emerges after 17 minutes No mention of object entering or exiting water Witness contradicts description of object's interaction with water
Altering Accounts
Initial Presentation:
Witness claims not to have seen the object enter the water
A podcast features the witness, containing several other insights
Subsequent Discussions:
Witness alters details after discussion with another news source
New elements added to the witness's narrative over time
Scrutinizing Video Footage
Thermal Imagery:
Object exhibits alternating heat signatures
Optical targeting system malfunctioned when locked onto object
Eyewitness Accounts:
Descriptions of stiff, scale-like appendages on object
Object only visible in thermal spectrum, invisible in night vision
Camera Technology:
Aerostat-mounted cameras captured footage
Object's movement tracked over Lake Habbaniyah, Anbar Province, Iraq
Video Duration:
Confirmed 17-minute duration by the witness
Disparity in narrative concerning object's actions after video ends
Heat Signature Analysis
Recent developments have provided additional insights into the thermal characteristics of the unidentified aerial phenomenon colloquially referred to as the "jellyfish UFO." A previous account described the object's ability to oscillate between thermal extremes rapidly, transitioning from hot to cold as captured on a thermal imaging system.
Key Observations:
The entity exhibited a stark contrast in thermal signatures, suggesting an ability to regulate its temperature or reflect varying amounts of infrared radiation.
The thermal imaging equipment, designed for precision targeting, experienced an unusual malfunction when attempting to establish a lock on the target.
Direct eyewitnesses corroborated the occurrence, noting that the appendages of the UFO appeared structurally rigid and geometric, likened to scales or armor.
Reports from personnel equipped with standard night vision devices confirmed the object was not visible in the optical spectrum, further emphasizing its detectability was isolated to thermal sensors.
Additional Findings:
Situational urgency escalated when multinational military forces became involved, and the video feed was abruptly terminated.
The object's behavior included rapid descent into a body of water, with no change in its rigid structure during this transition.
After a period of seventeen minutes submerged, the object re-emerged and accelerated away at a 45-degree angle at considerable speed.
Discrepancies:
An alternate testimony refuted the sighting of the object entering the water, instead suggesting the video portrayed the UAP simply diminishing in size until it was no longer visible, potentially due to the aerostat camera zooming out or the UAP distancing itself.
The original narrative of a 17-minute underwater hiatus highlighted by a stark ascent was called into question. This discrepancy highlights potential variances between witness testimonies or suggests a divergence in the perceived behavior of the UFO.
The veracity of these accounts remains a topic of debate and underscores the complexity of interpreting thermal imaging data, especially when concerning objects of unknown origin or capability.
Unusual Observations in Optical Surveillance Equipment
Recent insights have come to light concerning observations made by a tertiary party regarding an unidentified flying object, colloquially referred to as the "jellyfish UFO." Approximately six years ago, this individual, whilst stationed at a military base in Iraq, became aware of the phenomenon through a video which contrasts in certain aspects with the initial account provided by Jeremy Corell.
The optical instruments designed for precision targeting encountered disruptions rendering them incapable of establishing a lock on the object. This equipment, typically capable of engaging a target at considerable distance, indicated irregularities when attempting to focus on the entity. Witnesses utilizing the thermal imaging observed the object transitioning rapidly between heat signatures, an anomaly suggesting temperature fluctuations.
Characteristic details reported include appendages of the entity exhibiting a rigid, geometric pattern, akin to scales or armor plating. This description, however, remains unique to the thermal spectrum, with night-vision devices unable to detect the anomaly.
The abrupt termination of video feeds from the optical device raised concerns, with multiple nations involved in the immediate cessation of surveillance. The object's behavior furthered intrigue as it purportedly halted over a water body before submerging in a controlled manner.
After a seventeen-minute period of absence, the object is said to have emerged and rapidly ascended at a 45-degree trajectory. These movements mirror reported incidents at nuclear facilities, underscoring the potential significance of such events.
Contradicting these observations, the recent testimony of Michael Sinowski presents a divergent account, particularly concerning the object's interaction with water. Sinowski confirms the existence of multiple recordings, varying in length, but denies witnessing the object's submersion. His experience, supported by a fellow team member's statement, outlines a continuous trajectory past the military base and over an adjacent lake without visible descent into the water.
Sinowski's account introduces a perspective which differs from the original narrative and suggests alternative interpretations of the jellyfish UFO's properties and behaviors. The nature and significance of the object remain subjects of discussion and inquiry.
Observations from On-Site Witnesses and Confirmation
Shapes Described in Sightings
Witnesses directly involved in the sighting reported that the unidentified object possessed distinct structural characteristics. They described it as having stiff protrusions, akin to rigid scales or armor-like formations. This description remained consistent among different accounts, indicating a clear geometric pattern to the object's structure.
Effectiveness of Night Vision Equipment
During the attempts to identify and track the unusual object, personnel equipped with night vision devices reported their inability to detect it through this standard equipment. This suggests the object emitted no substantial light or heat that night vision could detect, contrasting with its clear visibility in thermal imaging.
Detection on the Thermal Spectrum
In thermal imaging, the object displayed notable fluctuations between hot and cold signatures. This was evident from the shifts in coloration seen on the imaging equipment, oscillating between white and black. The thermal spectrum uniquely captured the object, emphasizing its apparent variation in temperature and confirming its presence.
Observation Type Equipment Used Visibility Notes Geometric Shape Recognition None (Visual) Not Applicable Described as stiff, scale-like protrusions. Night Vision Records Standard Night Vision Equipment None Object remained undetectable. Thermal Spectrum Analysis Thermal Imaging Devices High Clear visibility, temperature differentials.
Eyewitness reports highly prioritized the investigation of the object due to its unusual thermal signature and potential implications. Unanticipated interference occurred when international parties involved suddenly ceased the transmission of related feeds, elevating concern and intrigue around the incident.
Concealment and Global Participation in the Jellyfish UFO Incident
An additional witness has emerged with insights on the so-called jellyfish UFO incident initially portrayed in Jeremy Corbell's video. This individual, present at the same military base in Iraq when the footage was captured nearly half a decade prior, provides a narrative with discrepancies to Corbell's account.
Witness Account and Variations
Thermal Optics Observation: It's reported that the sighting was captured through a thermal optics device mounted on a weapon platform, where the object displayed fluctuating temperature signatures by alternating color on the thermal imagery.
Malfunction and Inability to Lock Targets: The equipment used to observe the target seemingly malfunctioned, unable to secure a lock for engagement, an anomaly considering the proficiency of the platform to accurately target at significant distances.
Limited Motion Detection: Described as having rigid, geometric appendages resembling scales, the object's presence was noted exclusively under thermal vision, as attempts to detect it with night vision equipment were fruitless.
International Surveillance and Sudden Omission of Data: Following the sighting, rapid cessation of data sharing among different national entities was observed, raising concerns regarding the motive for such immediate discontinuation of information.
Unusual Behavior Over Water: The UFO was seen to halt abruptly above water and maintain a rigid posture as it descended, remaining submerged for a precise duration before reemerging and departing at a sharp angle. This particular movement pattern piqued interest due to its similarity to reported behavior of objects near sensitive installations.
Contradictory Recollections
Differing Observations: Michael Sinosi, who also experienced the event, contests specific details about the UFO's interaction with water.
Persistent Anomalies: The narrative evolved with Sinosi referencing multiple recordings of the UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon), demonstrating varying lengths of the footage. This variance suggested the event was recorded multiple times, a detail omitted in initial reports.
Coverage and Personnel Duties: It is recounted that the anomalous object was continuously monitored by stationed Marines to determine if it posed a threat. Despite regular surveillance, no alarming behavior justifying a scramble to defensive positions was recorded.
Evidence Capture Methodology: The video in question was obtained with an aerostat's camera system. Personnel attempted to track the object as it progressed past the base and over a nearby lake, with the ultimate path of the object — whether into the water or over the lake — remaining inconclusive.
In the unfolding of this event, the discrepancy between the accounts of Jeremy Corbell and Michael Sinosi invites a scrutinizing assessment of the details provided, particularly those pertaining to the object's observed traits and behaviors. Engaging in further inquiry may yield a clearer understanding of the incident's true nature.
Encounter with an Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon
During my tenure as an Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance (ISR) Tactical Controller at the military base in Iraq, an aerostat balloon captured footage of an anomalous object in 2017. This object, colloquially termed the "spaghetti monster," first appeared on thermal imaging. The animals present on the camera were black indicating the setting was likely in black hot mode. During the object's appearance, it displayed a striking behavior of fluctuating temperatures, visible as shifts between white and black, denoting rapid temperature changes from hot to cold and vice versa. This was unusual given the Optics platform malfunction during the event; even with the capability to precision target at considerable distances, the Optics could not establish a lock on the object – a distinctive anomaly.
The visual aspects of the phenomenon were striking. The tendrils emanating from it appeared rigid and unmoving, with a semblance to geometric scales or a type of armor. These visuals formed the primary basis for identification when witnessed through thermal imaging. However, when attempts were made to observe it through night vision equipment, it remained undetectable, emphasizing its detectability solely within the thermal spectrum.
Regarding its interactions with water, I received direct reports that the object descended abruptly, stiff as if premeditated, into Lake Habbaniyah, in Anbar Province. This act was devoid of any gradual movement, rather a straight descent into the aquatic environment. After a precise duration of 17 minutes submerged, the object re-emerged and abruptly ascended at a 45-degree angle at a high velocity. This exit was as sudden as its entry, deficient of any transitional motion typically associated with known aircraft or natural phenomena.
While some details have led to alternative narratives and refutations about the object's behavior, particularly regarding its interaction with water, the primary testimony underscores the mysterious action of vanishing and reappearing from the lake. This substantial deviation from previously recorded patterns of both natural and human-made airborne objects attracted high-priority attention and led to an immediate cessation of the live feed documenting the occurrence, signaling the significant concern it raised among the observing parties.
Key Points:
Temperature Variations: The object alternated between extreme temperature signatures.
Rigid Appendages: Viewed through thermal optics, the object had unyielding protrusions resembling scales.
Thermal Signature: Only detectable in the thermal spectrum, invisible to night vision.
Water Interaction: Descended sharply into water, re-emerged abruptly after a fixed time.
Movement Patterns: Exhibited non-linear movement, including a rapid, angled departure.
Note: Such an incident is reported with the intent to accurately convey the conditions and observations made without drawing definitive conclusions on the nature of the encountered object. Further analysis and investigation are critical for comprehensive understanding.
Encounters with Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
Recent testimonies provide new insights into an unusual sighting of an unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) that military personnel have nicknamed the "Spaghetti Monster." The sighting by U.S. Marines occurred over a base in Anbar Province, Iraq. Additional details have surfaced which challenge previous narratives and shed light on the characteristics of the phenomenon.
Eyewitness Accounts:
A Marine veteran, Michael Sinowski, stationed as an intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance tactical controller, reported the UAP sighting in 2017.
The object was first noticed when its thermal signature appeared to fluctuate from hot to cold.
Tracking systems experienced an inability to maintain a lock on the object, an immediate peculiarity noticed by the operatives.
The phenomenon was reportedly visible only in the thermal spectrum, evading detection by night vision technology.
Physical Characteristics:
Witnesses describe the UAP as having rigid extensions, geometric in form, similar to scales or armor.
The UAP demonstrated an abrupt transition from aerial to aquatic environments, reportedly stopping "stiff" over water before submerging.
Following a 17-minute underwater interval, the object emerged, ascending at a 45-degree angle and accelerating away rapidly.
Inconsistencies and Confirmations:
Contrasting accounts emerged regarding the UAP's interaction with water; some claiming the UAP submerged, while others did not corroborate this detail.
A collaborator of Sinowski, preferring anonymity, confirmed multiple recordings of the UAP, indicating variations in the duration of the occurrences.
The aerostat-based visual recording system, which captured the footage of the UAP, was utilized as a lookout for potential threats. Marines were tasked with monitoring and possibly engaging with the entity, though no defensive maneuvers were initiated due to its unspecified nature. The labeled "Spaghetti Monster" provoked curiosity rather than concern amongst military observers at the time.
The case continues to evoke discussions and analyses within the UAP research community, with the latest revelations prompting reconsiderations of previously held notions about this and potentially related phenomena.
Strategies to Boost Audience Interaction
To increase viewer participation on our channel, consider the following methods:
Release Consistency: Videos are published daily at 12:00 PM CST to maintain a regular schedule.
Audience Engagement: Encourage viewers to engage by subscribing, liking, and commenting to support our content.
Visual Clues: Utilize contrasting thermal imagery to enhance viewer understanding of the subject matter.
Expert Testimony: Provide firsthand accounts from direct eyewitnesses to substantiate events.
Detailed Analysis: Offer in-depth examinations of unique phenomena, like the alternation of heat signatures from an object.
Technical Insights: Explain complex scenarios, such as the failure of a weapon platform to lock onto a target, in layman's terms.
Collaborative Efforts: Discuss the involvement of multiple nations in the investigation of unusual occurrences.
Interactive Elements: Share visual elements like video clips from interviews to enrich the narrative.
Adhering to these strategies should effectively cultivate an active and engaged audience.
Reflective Review and In-Depth Analysis
Background on the Recent Witness Account:
A recent interview provided new insights into the much-discussed footage of an unidentified flying object, which resembles a jellyfish. This testimony adds to the ongoing debate about the video's authenticity and its seemingly contradictory narratives.
Emergence of New Details:
The individual, who claimed to have been stationed at the same military base in Iraq where the original footage was captured, reported observing similar sightings. Notably, these observations introduce variances that raise questions about the established account of events.
Shift in Witness Narrative:
The witness's version of events evolved over time, sparking curiosity about the reasons behind these changes. It is suggested that there could be valid explanations for this evolution, which add another layer to the story.
Video Analysis:
Recorded via thermal imaging on a military weapon's platform, the object demonstrated fluctuating heat signatures by transitioning between white and black colors. Additionally, the equipment experienced difficulties in achieving a lock on the target, which stood out as unusual.
Eyewitness Corroboration:
Verification from direct eyewitnesses suggests that this phenomenon indeed occurred. Observers using different optical tools described the object as having rigid, geometric, scale-like features.
Optical Discrepancies:
Although visible in the thermal range, the object remained undetectable through night vision equipment, emphasizing the peculiarity of its physical characteristics.
Interruption of Transmission:
The sudden cessation of available video feeds by multiple nations signaled an elevated level of concern, possibly indicative of security protocols or the sensitive nature of the encounter.
Behavioral Patterns of the Object:
The object was observed descending into a body of water with apparent precision and, after a period of inactivity, reemerged and swiftly departed at a 45-degree angle.
Skepticism and Confirmation:
Additional perspectives came to light following this account's exposure in mainstream media. An ex-marine, reported to have served at the base during the time of the sighting, provided a recount that partially contradicted the initial reports, specifically negating the object's submersion in water.
Independent Verification:
Corroborative statements from anonymous teammates affirmed multiple recordings of the unusual phenomenon, which further complicates the narrative.
Interview Findings:
The marine veteran, during his disclosure, neither confirmed a terrestrial nor extraterrestrial origin for the object. Their account detailed the monitoring of the object as it traversed the area and detailed it being tracked via an aerostat surveillance system as it lingered over Lake Habbaniyah.
Continued Investigation:
Despite having watched the full duration of the video in question, the marine's account implied there was little more to be disclosed. The suggested behavior pointed toward the object simply retreating into the distance rather than submerging into the lake, as previously mentioned.
Stefen Greenstreet's Role in the UFO Account
Stefen Greenstreet played a pivotal role in shedding light on a debated extraterrestrial encounter. He was instrumental in reaching out to a military veteran, Michael Sinowski, who provided an alternative narrative to an existing story about an unusual aerial phenomenon, commonly referred to as the Jellyfish UFO. Sinowski's account offered insights that sometimes contrasted with previously established descriptions of the event.
Key Points from Greenstreet's Engagement:
Initiated contact with Michael Sinowski after the latter's comment on a news platform.
Facilitated an interview where Sinowski recounted his experience and observations.
Sinowski, who had served on the same military base where the incident was recorded, disputed certain aspects of the initial story, especially the object's interaction with water.
Michael Sinowski's Observations:
Did not witness the object entering or emerging from the water as described.
Indicated that similar unidentified objects had been recorded multiple times, with varying durations.
Referred to the object as the "spaghetti monster," a nickname given by fellow Marines.
Details Surfaced in His Disclosures:
The object was monitored using an aerostat's cameras as it moved near the base and over Lake Hanania.
Marines attempted to track it using night vision and other sensors without success.
The object was perceived as a non-threat and did not cause a defensive scramble.
Sequence of Events According to Sinowski:
Confirmed viewing the full 17-minute video.
At the end of the footage, the object appeared to continue into the distance until it was no longer visible.
Clarified that the UFO either moved away over the lake or the camera zoomed out, but it did not submerge into the lake as claimed.
Greenstreet's interaction with Sinowski brought forth these critical points that have added a new layer to the understanding of the purported Jellyfish UFO sighting.
Michael Sinosi's Counterpoint and Dialogue
Nickname Attributed to the UFO
As an intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance tactical controller, I was stationed at an Iraqi base where the UFO footage surfaced. My fellow Marines colloquially termed the object as "the spaghetti monster." This moniker arose during routine surveillance when the anomaly was first detected.
Monitoring Methods Employed
My responsibility included overseeing the tracking of the UFO, which we encountered through our surveillance equipment. We were vigilant in observing the entity to ensure it posed no immediate threat. Various attempts were made to detect the object using night vision and other available sensors, yet it remained elusive, with the exception of its thermal signature.
Balloon-Carried Camera as the Source
The footage in question originated from an aerostat—a large balloon resembling a blimp; stationed above the base. This surveillance instrument was fitted with cameras tasked with monitoring for potential dangers.
Path Trajectory Dissection
As the object approached our base and continued towards Lake Habbaniyah in Anbar Province, we monitored its movement closely. The verifiable aspects of the footage I saw encompassed the entire duration, and contrary to some reports, it did not show the object submerging in the water.
Timestamp Action Observation Start UFO's initial sighting on camera Consistent with previous descriptions End UFO's final moments on camera Recedes into the distance, gets smaller until no longer visible
Throughout this period, the object seemed to simply progress away, either diminishing due to the camera's focal adjustments or its actual departure into the distance.
Witness Testimonies Compared
When analyzing witness testimonies regarding the jellyfish-like Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP), disparities emerge, particularly regarding its interaction with water. Initially, the object's alternating temperature, as seen on thermal imaging, raised questions. The optics platform's malfunction during targeting, which typically could engage a target at 27 meters, hinted at the object's peculiarity.
Main Witness (Initial Account):
Described appendages with geometric shapes and a scale-like surface.
Observed the UAP only visible in the thermal spectrum, invisible to night vision.
Claimed the object ceased all motion over water, entering it in a rigid manner.
Subsequent disappearance for 17 minutes before emerging at a 45-degree angle.
Additional Witness (Contradictory Account):
Did not observe the UAP enter or interact with the water.
Confirmed multiple recordings with varying lengths of the UAP.
Agreed the object was tracked by an aerostat's cameras.
Described the object as moving away into the distance, with no indication it submerged.
Aspect Main Witness Additional Witness Interaction with Water Yes No Visibility on Night Vision No Not mentioned Physical Description Geometric Not specified Duration Noted 17 minutes Varied recordings Final Movement of UAP 45-degree angle departure Moving away till unseen
Analysis of these accounts is critical when piecing together the event's narrative. The main witness detailed a specific behavior pattern involving water that seems unsupported by the additional witness's statement. This additional witness refuted seeing any water entry, challenging the main narrative's validity on this point. The precise cause or nature of these differences remains undetermined, leading to a complex puzzle for observers attempting to understand the UAP's characteristics and behaviors.
Final Thoughts and Next Steps
Several important details have emerged regarding the event captured in the well-known footage commonly referred to as the "jellyfish UFO." The occurrence was observed on an optical platform that encountered targeting issues when attempting to lock onto the object. Witnesses at the scene described the object's appendages as rigid with geometric shapes, akin to armor-like scales. Interestingly, despite the availability of night vision equipment, the appearance was only detectable through the thermal spectrum, which raises questions about the object's material composition and electromagnetic characteristics.
It is worth noting that the shutting down of feeds by participating nations during the observation heightens the intrigue and necessitates further inquiry. The subject, when observed over a body of water, was seen descending linearly, remaining submerged for a precise 17-minute duration before rapid ascent and departure at a sharp angle. These maneuvers, particularly the abrupt transition from submersion to motion, suggest advanced propulsion technology beyond our current understanding.
There have been variances in eyewitness accounts, including an individual—Michael Sinosi—who cast doubt on the claim that the object entered the water. He has disclosed additional information regarding the incident, including the existence of multiple recordings with varying lengths capturing the phenomenon. During his interview, Sinosi did not corroborate the submersion aspect of the event, suggesting it merely moved away until it was no longer visible, possibly due to the sensor's range limits.
Given that the aerial phenomenon was monitored as it traveled near the base and over Lake Hanania in Anar Province, Iraq, further collaborative research and analysis are recommended. Experts should consider the compiled data, diverse sensor technologies involved, and the potential implications for both national security and our understanding of aerial phenomena.
Interested individuals are encouraged to contribute additional insights or evidence that may shed light on the events in question. It is also beneficial for those involved or knowledgeable in the related fields to participate in discussions and conduct thorough analyses. The enigmatic nature of the "jellyfish UFO" serves as a reminder of the vast unknowns still to explore in the realm of aerospace and defense.
Source Links
Vetted Video (Jeremy Corbell UFO Video): https://youtu.be/6j3DFbMsadg?si=FEMdjAP6osRRKSyP
TMZ Presents UFO Revolution: https://tubitv.com/movies/200044921/s01-e01-the-breakthrough?utm_campaign=web-sharing
Jellyfish UFO Video ONLY: https://youtu.be/7bns_WhNAQM?si=RNG26zacl8be5BhV
Steven Greenstreet Tweet 1: https://x.com/MiddleOfMayhem/status/1745138264254918982?s=20
Steven Greenstreet Tweet 2: https://x.com/MiddleOfMayhem/status/1745530584766779448?s=20
Michael Cincoski (Witness): https://x.com/MRCinco96/status/1745803469603172479?s=20
Newsnation Interview With Michael Cincoski: https://youtu.be/d0V9mhk9Hm0?si=1HjI-5uRDti8Cj9f
Artisan Tony Interview With Michael Cincoski: https://www.youtube.com/live/uKkbw4rkOLo?si=9Ulcfs5yGfixNlyW
Mick West Analysis Of Jellyfish UFO Video: https://youtu.be/ojotsKjshHc?si=1_tHCeK8PMwiprbf
