New UFO Laws Coming Soon Says Journalist Jeremy Corbell
Unprecedented legislative strides are at the forefront of public discourse as proposed measures on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) transparency surface in Congress. Spearheaded by notable advocates for UAP disclosure, the recent developments suggest significant changes, aiming to enhance governmental accountability and public access to information on UAP. These efforts highlight a potential paradigm shift in how the government classifies and shares data on aerial anomalies, with implications extending to contractors and private entities.
Contained within these legislative advancements are amendments poised to alter the landscape of UAP research and public engagement. The possibility of mandated government audits, restrictions on clandestine UAP programs, and protective measures for whistleblowers represent a collective push towards greater openness. The dialogue around these proposals extends beyond Congressional halls, with active discussions taking place across social media platforms and among citizen journalists dedicated to unraveling the intricacies of UAP phenomena and policy.
Key Takeaways
Legislative proposals suggest increasing transparency and public engagement in UAP matters.
Amendments aim to modify classification processes and information sharing regarding UAP.
Social media and citizen journalism play a vital role in discussing and disseminating UAP developments.
Jeremy Corbell Highlights Significance of Upcoming UAP Legislation
Jeremy Corbell, a notable figure in the UAP community, has emphasized the importance of the forthcoming legislative week for UAP transparency. On September 17th, Corbell urged stakeholders to understand and then act upon the upcoming legislation, encapsulating his message with the rallying cry, "go go UFO."
Drawing attention to several key legislative proposals, Corbell points to a provision—Section 1089 of the Senate National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)—mandating the Department of Defense to successfully pass audits starting in 2027. This measure appears to aim for a greater financial oversight within defense sectors pertaining to UAPs.
The discussion moves to a piece of legislation labeled the Gillibrand Amendment, outlined in Section 1646, which prevents funds from being used on undisclosed UAP programs. This amendment also obliges government contractors to disclose any UAP materials they possess and permits inspections, a significant step towards greater transparency if enforced effectively.
Subsequently, outlined in Division G, is the Schumer Amendment. This advocates for the declassification of UAP-related information and allows for the use of eminent domain to obtain UAP crash materials. Despite its potential, concerns arise regarding its effectiveness internationally, involving the sovereignty of other nations.
Additionally, Title VI of the Intelligence Authorization Act (IAA) is addressed, proposing reforms to the Inspector General process. This includes protections against retaliatory actions for individuals disclosing UAP information, seemingly prompted by past experiences within the intelligence community that have obstructed transparency.
Title VII of the IAA introduces reforms for classifying U.S. government information, potentially easing the process of declassifying and raising barriers for new classifications, directly impacting UAP secrecy.
Consideration is then given to Title IX of the IAA, which is concerned with anomalous health incidents associated with UAPs or similar occurrences, like the Havana Syndrome. It speaks to increased assistance for affected U.S. Personnel and mandates more thorough reporting to Congress.
Title XI encloses another iteration of the Gillibrand Amendment but also introduces a liability shield for contractors revealing their UAP findings, ostensibly providing a form of amnesty to encourage disclosure.
In conclusion, these excerpts from the planned legislation offer a multifaceted approach to dealing with UAPs and the repercussions of their presence. Corbell advocates for the UAP community to rally support for these potential reforms, as he believes they represent a positive movement toward greater transparency and understanding within the field of UAP phenomena.
Detailed Analysis of UAP Legislative Provisions
In recent discussions, several key legislative elements pertaining to Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) have been brought forward, signaling significant movements towards enhancing transparency and accountability within UAP research and reporting.
Legislative Requirement for Defense Audit A critical provision under consideration is the implementation of a rigorous audit requirement for the Department of Defense (DoD). Starting in 2027, the DoD will be mandated to successfully complete its audits annually.
Gillibrand Amendment: Expenditure Transparency In another notable development, the Gillibrand Amendment (Section 1646) aims to remove the veil of secrecy around UAP-related expenditures that are not currently disclosed to Congress. This requires contractors to report any UAP encounters and allows inspection, thus potentially bridging gaps in the flow of information.
Schumer Amendment: Declassification Processes The Schumer Amendment takes bold steps towards the declassification of UAP information. Additionally, it authorizes the acquisition of UAP-related material through eminent domain, albeit within US territorial confines.
Reform of IG Process Recognizing the sensitive nature of UAP-related disclosures, Title VI of the Intelligence Authorization Act aims to protect individuals reporting their experiences. The reform seeks to offer legal recourse against retaliatory actions affecting individuals' security clearances and access.
Classification Reforms in UAP Reporting Title VII brings about substantial reforms easing the process of declassification while tightening the criteria for classifying information. This change is anticipated to be instrumental in improving the openness of government-held UAP data.
Anomalous Health Incident Provisions Title IX addresses the health impact on personnel encountering UAPs by stipulating augmented support and mandating detailed reports to Congress regarding these events, highlighting a notable recognition of the potential physical effects of UAP encounters.
Amnesty for Contractors' UAP Disclosures Finally, consistency with Senator Gillibrand's approach is observed in Title XI, proposing a liability shield for contractors willing to disclose UAP materials, thus encouraging transparency while offering necessary legal protection.
As these legislative proposals gain traction, there is a palpable optimism surrounding the future of UAP research and the potential impacts on national transparency and security practices.
Legislative Consequences Concerning Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
Recent amendments in the legislative sphere have ushered in significant strides regarding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) transparency and reporting. Section 1089 mandates that the Department of Defense (DoD) pass an audit annually starting in 2027, a move advocated by several transparency proponents.
The Gillibrand Amendment (Section 1646) introduces a critical development; it bars the allocation of funds for undisclosed UAP programs and obliges government contractors to disclose any information on UAPs, including permitting inspections of materials. This represents a significant policy shift, encouraging greater transparency in government-contractor engagements concerning UAPs.
Moreover, The Schumer Amendment broadly addresses the declassification of UAP information and directs the exercise of eminent domain over materials related to UAP crashes, potentially empowering the government to seize such materials for examination.
Reforms in the Inspector General (IG) process have also been introduced, reflecting on instances of retribution against those disclosing UAP information. The provision seeks to mitigate any retaliatory acts towards individuals who bring UAP encounters to light.
Title VII’s reforms pivot towards an easier path for declassifying information related to UAPs, which could foster greater transparency and reduce the propensity for secretive classifications within the government.
The legislation also acknowledges health issues associated with UAP encounters, as specified in Title IX’s provisions. It aims to extend support to personnel affected by such incidents and mandates increased reporting to Congress.
Title 11 touches on a fascinating addition akin to an amnesty provision, featuring a liability shield for contractors that report their UAP encounters. This measure could foster an environment where individuals are encouraged to come forward without fear of punitive consequences.
The comprehensive legislative push reflects a newfound acknowledgment of UAP issues at the governmental level, indicating a transformation in how such phenomena are managed and potentially signaling a new era of openness and rigorous inquiry.
Dissemination and Reach of Information
In recent discussions on upcoming legislative measures, there's significant attention on Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) transparency initiatives. These measures, embedded within the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Intelligence Authorization Act (IAA) for 2024, possess several key provisions aimed at enhancing understanding and governance of UAPs.
Key Measures:
Audit Requirements: A stipulation mandates the Department of Defense to successfully pass annual audits from 2027 onward.
Disclosure to Congress: An amendment urges disclosure of any UAP-related information by government contractors, while endorsing inspections by regulatory authorities.
Declassification of UAP Data: A separate amendment suggests broad permissions for UAP information declassification and asserts governmental authority over UAP crash materials.
Whistleblower Protections: Reforms intend to provide better support against retaliatory reactions for individuals disclosing UAP-related information.
Classification Reforms: Proposed amendments are designed to simplify the declassification process for materials and complicate unnecessary classification.
Health Incident Provisions: Provisions aim to bolster support for US personnel affected by anomalous health incidents and ensure detailed reporting to Congress.
Contractor Liability Shield: Offers a liability shield to contractors who report UAP materials, encouraging transparency and protection for whistleblowers.
These developments reflect efforts to institutionalize a transparent, accountable approach to UAP phenomena. With ample discussions and resources available, individuals can engage with this extensive subject matter further, ensuring a well-informed public discourse.
Examination of Legislative Provisions Regarding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
Senate Document Scrutiny
As the origins of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) continue to intrigue, the Senate has put forward a document containing multiple provisions aimed at enhancing UAP transparency. This document is a segment of the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) combined with the Intelligence Authorization Act (IAA). A detailed look at these provisions reveals significant steps towards public disclosures and governmental accountability.
Provision Analysis:
Audit Requirement: From 2027, the Department of Defense (DoD) must successfully pass an annual audit.
Gillibrand Amendment: Blocks funding for undisclosed UAP programs and mandates government contractors to disclose any UAP-related materials or information, along with consenting to inspections.
Classification Reforms:
Schumer Amendment: Calls for broader declassification of UAP information and allows for the use of eminent domain regarding UAP crash materials.
Title VI: Amends the Inspector General (IG) process to better protect individuals from retaliation due to their disclosure of sensitive information.
Title VII: Implements overarching reforms to the classification process within the federal government, simplifying the declassification of information pertinent to UAP.
Health and Transparency Provisions:
Title IX: Addresses anomalous health incidents linked to UAPs, providing support and ensuring increased reportage to Congress.
Title XI: Features a repetition of the Gillibrand Amendment, likely to be removed in the final bill, inclusive of a liability shield for contractors reporting UAP materials—an "amnesty provision."
A comprehensive copy of this expansive Senate bill is available for public review, encouraging engagement and discourse on the subject of UAP transparency and government handling of unexplained phenomena.
Civic Involvement and Independent Reporting in UAP Matters
The upswing in legislative activity concerning unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) signifies a critical period for UAP transparency. An intriguing blend of upcoming adjustments to UAP-related legislation is being considered. For instance, a specific section within the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) mandates the Department of Defense to successfully complete its financial audits starting from 2027.
Moreover, an amendment introduced in the NDAA seeks to prevent the allocation of funds to UAP programs not reported to Congress. This amendment also obliges all contractors to disclose any UAP materials and information they possess to government authorities, along with permitting inspection of such materials. While its effectiveness remains to be observed, it is a progressive stride toward openness.
Another amendment proposes wide-ranging authority for the declassification of UAP information and the assertion of eminent domain to acquire UAP crash materials. This suggests a more aggressive approach to collecting UAP data domestically, though its application to international finds could introduce complexities involving foreign governments.
Additional legislative reforms are on the table, aimed at improving safeguards for individuals reporting retaliatory acts linked to their UAP disclosures. Legislative actions also target the general classification procedures within the federal government, potentially making it simpler to declassify information and more challenging to justify new classifications, which could have direct relevance for the handling of UAP concerns.
Attention is also being given to U.S. personnel who experience health incidents connected to anomalous encounters, with provisions for enhanced support. The broader coverage of varied facets of UAP phenomena reflects a comprehensive approach to addressing the topic.
In the realm of liability and reporting, there's talk of an amnesty provision for contractors that step forward with their UAP-related data, ensuring their security upon disclosure. Recognizing whistleblower protections underscores the importance of safeguarding those who contribute to the public knowledge of UAPs.
Citizen involvement and the rise of independent journalism play a pivotal role in pushing for disclosure and narrating the unfolding story of UAP transparency. This highlights the value of public engagement in shaping the conversation and influencing policy on matters of UAPs and national security.
Final Thoughts on UAP Legislation Developments
Recent discussions in the legislative arena have emphasized the importance of UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon) transparency and potential legislation. Important provisions under review in the Senate version of the 2024 combined National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Intelligence Authorization Act (IAA), aim to enhance government oversight and public understanding of UAP occurrences.
A key provision in Section 1089 of the NDAA is the stipulation that the Department of Defense (DoD) must successfully clear fiscal audits starting in 2027, promoting greater financial accountability.
Section 1646, commonly referred to as the Gillibrand Amendment, places restrictions on the allocation of funds for undisclosed UAP programs. It further mandates that contractors report any UAP-related materials or information to relevant authorities and submit them to inspections.
The Schumer Amendment in Division G concerns the declassification of UAP information and authorizes the use of eminent domain over UAP crash materials, on the chance they could be located domestically.
Title VI of the IAA, combined with the NDAA, proposes modifications to the Inspector General process to include protections against retaliation when disclosing information, particularly in cases related to clearance revocation.
Title VII of the IAA addresses government classification procedures, potentially making it easier to declassify and more challenging to classify information related to UAPs.
In Title IX, the legislation touches on anomalous health incidents likened to UAPs and Havana syndrome by proposing enhanced support for affected U.S. personnel and more thorough reporting to Congress.
Title XI introduces a similar provision to Gillibrand's Amendment concerning UAP material disclosure by contractors. It also provides a liability shield as an incentive for contractors to report such information.
The lengthy Senate bill, amassing over 2,300 pages, is accessible through provided links for those interested in the intricate details of the proposed legislation.
Engagement with these developments, whether through citizen journalism or active support for ongoing disclosure efforts, encourages a process transparent to the public and contributes to the broader conversation about UAPs.
Source Links
LINK TO TWEET: https://x.com/JeremyCorbell/status/1703285851000856803?s=20
