EXCLUSIVE STATEMENT Released To Vetted

The UFO community faces a significant shift as podcast host Kelly Chase concludes her show "UFO Rabbit Hole" while addressing complex narratives within UFO disclosure. Her statements during the final episode sparked discussions across social media platforms and research circles, particularly regarding the role of military intelligence in UFO information sharing.

A debate emerged when UFO researcher Red Panda Koala shared Chase's comments, interpreting them as criticism of Luis Elizondo and the broader disclosure movement. The situation highlights the intricate relationships between researchers, government officials, and media personalities in the UFO research field, raising questions about transparency and information verification.

Key Takeaways

  • Recent statements by prominent UFO researchers reveal growing tensions about disclosure narratives

  • The relationship between military intelligence and UFO information sharing faces increased scrutiny

  • Social media discussions demonstrate diverse interpretations of researcher statements and motivations

Setting and Background Information

Motivation Behind the Content Creation

A UFO Community dispute emerged on social media platforms, centering around statements made during the final episode of "The UFO Rabbit Hole" podcast. This content addresses misinterpretations and clarifies positions within the UFO research community.

Professional Connection with RPK

Prior collaborations between content creators included shared podcast clips and mutual support during online discussions. Professional interactions remained civil, with occasional exchanges and public support during community disagreements. Both parties maintained respectful communication throughout their professional relationship.

RPK posted content suggesting Kelly Chase, previously associated with the "UFO Rabbit Hole" podcast, had criticized Lou Elizondo. This interpretation sparked discussions across social media platforms. RPK's post included video clips and statements about Chase's background in PR and alleged connections to specific UFO community groups.

The situation prompted direct communication with Chase to clarify her position and provide her perspective on the circulating claims. Chase transitioned from "UFO Rabbit Hole" to focus on her new project, "Cosmosis," available on Apple TV.

The Research Community Dispute

Kelly Chase's Background

Kelly Chase hosted The UFO Rabbit Hole podcast before transitioning to her new venture, Cosmosis. The series streams on Apple TV and represents her latest work in UFO research. She garnered attention through her podcast investigations and collaborations with Jay Christopher King.

Social Media Commentary

A prominent UFO researcher and content creator, Red Panda Koala, shared a clip from Chase's final UFO Rabbit Hole episode on social media. The post gained significant attention within UFO research circles. His message included statements about Chase's professional background and alleged connections to specific groups within the UFO community.

Claims Regarding Intelligence Activities

Chase addressed multiple points about intelligence community involvement in UFO disclosures. She noted that many whistleblowers maintained active security clearances while working with defense contractors. She expressed skepticism toward recent disclosure movements since 2017, characterizing them as theatrical presentations.

The podcast host questioned the Department of Defense's role in information releases through DOPSR (Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review). She referenced specific statements from Lou Elizondo's book about his recruitment into AATIP by James Lacatski for counter-intelligence work.

Chase emphasized these key points:

  • Many whistleblowers remain active in intelligence roles

  • DOD maintains control over released information

  • Public discourse restricts certain factual discussions

  • The disclosure narrative serves specific objectives

Her statements marked a significant shift from her previous positions supporting various disclosure efforts. She stepped back from her earlier advocacy while expressing concerns about potentially dangerous aspects of deeper involvement in these matters.

Content Analysis

The UFO community experienced significant discourse when Kelly Chase released her final episode of the UFO Rabbit Hole podcast. Red Panda Koala, a UFO researcher, shared a post interpreting Chase's statements as criticism against Lou Elizondo.

Chase's departure from UFO Rabbit Hole marked a transition to her new venture, Cosmosis. During her final episode, she expressed changed perspectives about the UFO disclosure movement since 2017. She characterized recent developments as theatrical performances rather than genuine revelations.

The Department of Defense's involvement raises questions about information control. Chase noted that whistleblowers maintain active security clearances and connections to defense contractors. The DOD's approval process through DOPSR filters the shared information.

Lou Elizondo's background adds complexity to the narrative. His self-described role involves counter-intelligence expertise applied to UFO investigations, stemming from his 2008 recruitment into AATIP by James Lacatski.

The UFO disclosure movement faces scrutiny regarding its authenticity. Chase expressed skepticism about obtaining genuine answers from current sources, noting potential risks for those who investigate too deeply. She emphasized the limited role of public observers in understanding the complete picture.

Red Panda Koala's post sparked discussions about Chase's alleged associations with various UFO community groups. These interpretations led to broader debates about community dynamics and information sharing practices.

Response from Kelly Chase

Kelly Chase addressed several misconceptions circulating about her recent statements. The focus of discussion centers on comments made during the final episode of her podcast, UFO Rabbit Hole.

She states her perspective has evolved regarding the UFO disclosure movement since 2017. The information shared by whistleblowers comes from active members of the intelligence community who maintain security clearances and work with the Department of Defense or aerospace defense companies.

The narrative control surrounding this topic creates challenges. When people attempt to share direct quotes from Lou Elizondo's book about his counter-intelligence role, they face significant resistance from online communities.

Chase emphasizes she no longer accepts the current disclosure narrative as presented to the public. Through her experiences, she has observed concerning patterns that raise legitimate questions about the movement's authenticity.

She maintains a neutral stance on individual motivations within the disclosure movement. Her decision to step back stems from recognizing the complexities and potential risks involved in pursuing these matters further.

The UFO topic involves multiple layers of influence and competing interests. Chase notes that civilian researchers and enthusiasts remain limited in their ability to fully participate or understand the complete scope of what unfolds behind the scenes.

The Analyzed Broadcast Segment

A UFO researcher named Kelly Chase delivered a farewell message in her final episode of the UFO Rabbit Hole podcast. She expressed deep appreciation for the podcast's impact and the community it created.

Kelly revealed a significant shift in her perspective regarding UFO disclosure since 2017. She no longer supports the narrative of patriotic military intelligence officials risking their lives to reveal UFO information to the public.

The current whistleblowers maintain active security clearances and connections to the Department of Defense (DoD) or aerospace defense contractors. Their shared information receives DoD approval through official channels.

Key Points About Current Disclosure Efforts:

  • Information comes from active intelligence community members

  • Whistleblowers retain high-level security clearances

  • Content receives DoD approval through DOPSR

  • Public discourse restricts criticism of key figures

Kelly referenced Lou Elizondo's self-described role, noting his recruitment by James Lacatski to conduct counter-intelligence within ASAP. She pointed out the difficulty in discussing this publicly-available information from his book.

The podcast host concluded that the disclosure narrative appears largely fabricated when viewed objectively. She acknowledged experiencing disillusionment but emphasized she holds no interest in speculating about hidden agendas or competing interests.

Kelly stressed that the public serves only as spectators to these events, unable to access or understand the true nature of the disclosure movement. She expressed concern about dangerous aspects for those who investigate too deeply.

The Conversation on Disclosure

UFO researcher Red Panda Koala posted about a final episode of the UFO Rabbit Hole podcast, where host Kelly Chase shared perspectives on the disclosure movement. The post generated significant discussion within the UFO research community.

Kelly Chase recently concluded her UFO Rabbit Hole podcast to focus on her new project, Cosmosis, available on Apple TV. In her final episode, she expressed changed views regarding the UFO disclosure narrative since 2017.

The podcast host described the current disclosure movement as "theater" with specific objectives. She pointed out that many whistleblowers maintain active security clearances while working with defense departments or aerospace companies.

Chase raised questions about information control, noting that shared disclosures typically receive Department of Defense approval through proper channels. She referenced Lou Elizondo's self-described role in counter-intelligence and his 2008 assignment to apply those skills to the UFO community.

Red Panda Koala's social media post sparked discussions by suggesting Chase had shifted her stance on disclosure and specific figures in the field. The situation prompted varied reactions across UFO research circles.

Chase emphasized she no longer accepts the public presentation of the disclosure narrative, describing it as largely fabricated based on objective analysis. She expressed concerns about dark and potentially dangerous aspects for those who get too close to certain elements of the phenomenon.

The YouTuber's Commentary

Red Panda Koala posted statements about Kelly Chase's final episode of UFO Rabbit Hole podcast, suggesting she had turned against Lou Elizondo. The post claimed Chase belonged to the "L Crew" - a group of Elizondo supporters - and highlighted her PR background.

Chase addressed these claims through an exclusive statement. The video clip in question featured her discussing the end of her podcast and expressing changed views about UFO disclosure since 2017.

During the podcast episode, Chase expressed skepticism about recent UFO disclosures. She noted that many whistleblowers maintain active security clearances and connections to defense organizations.

The podcast host questioned the Department of Defense's role in controlling UFO narratives. She specifically referenced Elizondo's self-described background in counterintelligence and his 2008 assignment to apply those skills to the UFO community.

Chase emphasized she no longer accepts the public disclosure narrative at face value. She described the situation as a performance where observers cannot identify who controls the narrative.

The statements sparked debate within UFO research circles. Various community members interpreted her comments differently, leading to discussions about loyalty and credibility.

Previous
Previous

Joe Rogan's Wild Comments About UFOs To Ky Dickens From The Telepathy Tapes

Next
Next

VANISHING STARS DISCOVERED by Scientist Could Be Alien Megastructures