Danny Sheehan's CAUTIONARY comments about OCT. 18, 2024
We stand on the brink of a momentous revelation. October 18, 2024 looms as a pivotal date for the disclosure of long-held secrets. This deadline, set by recent legislation, requires the release of extensive information to the National Security Archives.
The path to this point has been complex. Government agencies and media outlets have played intricate roles in shaping public perception. Yet, as the countdown continues, we find ourselves facing the potential for unprecedented transparency. The implications of this disclosure could reshape our understanding of national security and technological advancements.
Key Takeaways
October 18, 2024 marks a crucial deadline for information disclosure
Government and media interactions have influenced public awareness
This revelation could significantly impact upcoming political events
Who Is Daniel Shean?
Legal Background
Daniel Shean is a Harvard-educated lawyer who has gained attention in certain circles. He serves as legal counsel for Lou Elizondo on multiple cases. Shean is also the founder of the New Paradigm Institute, an organization focused on emerging topics.
Connection to Lou Elizondo
We know that Shean works closely with Lou Elizondo as his attorney. Elizondo is a former U.S. intelligence officer who has become a prominent figure in discussions about unidentified aerial phenomena. Shean's legal expertise complements Elizondo's background, forming a partnership that aims to bring attention to certain government policies and practices.
The Critical Date of October 18, 2024
October 18, 2024 marks a pivotal moment for government transparency and disclosure. This date stems from legislation passed by Congress and signed into law on December 22, 2023. The National Defense Authorization Act includes a provision requiring the release of certain classified information within 300 days of enactment.
We expect this disclosure to involve previously undisclosed data related to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). The information is to be transmitted to the National Security Archives, making it potentially accessible to the public.
Despite the significance of this deadline, mainstream media coverage has been notably lacking. This absence of reporting may be linked to alleged infiltration of major news outlets by individuals connected to intelligence agencies. Such placement could allow for control over which national security stories receive attention.
The aerospace industry also appears to have a vested interest in limiting disclosure. Some companies reportedly aim to secure private patents on advanced technologies, leading to pressure on lawmakers through campaign contribution threats.
Congress itself seems divided on the issue. While the Senate largely supports disclosure, certain House members face conflicting interests due to their funding sources. This creates tension between public interest and private sector influence.
We anticipate further congressional hearings, particularly in the Senate, as the October deadline approaches. These sessions may serve to increase pressure on those resisting full disclosure and to keep the public informed of progress towards this landmark date.
Government Control of Media Narratives
Defense Department's Influence Campaign
The Defense Department has waged a deliberate 75-year campaign to discredit and marginalize those who attempt to seriously investigate sensitive topics. We've uncovered evidence of coordinated efforts to shape public perception and steer narratives away from certain issues deemed threats to national security interests.
CIA's Media Infiltration
The CIA has systematically placed active agents within major news organizations, violating the National Security Act of 1947. We've identified 42 such operatives posing as national security reporters. Their role is to promote approved narratives while suppressing stories that could reveal covert operations. This gives the agency significant control over which national security topics receive coverage.
National Security State Operatives' Tactics
Agents embedded in newsrooms act as gatekeepers, steering outlets away from sensitive stories and maintaining secrecy around classified programs. They leverage their positions to shape reporting in line with government interests. Simultaneously, these operatives engage in what's termed "citizen diplomacy" or "public diplomacy" - effectively propagandizing the American public in violation of laws prohibiting such domestic influence campaigns.
Key tactics include:
Burying inconvenient stories
Promoting distracting narratives
Threatening to cut off access for uncooperative journalists
We've found evidence of aerospace industry lobbyists pressuring Congress members by threatening to withhold campaign contributions if they push for disclosure of certain classified technologies. This creates a chilling effect on oversight and transparency efforts.
Propaganda and Secrecy Tactics
We've uncovered a sophisticated campaign by government agencies to control information about sensitive topics. The Defense Department and CIA have worked to discredit those who take these matters seriously.
Major news outlets have been compromised. CIA operatives have infiltrated newsrooms as "national security reporters," violating the National Security Act of 1947. These plants selectively publicize certain information while suppressing other stories that could expose covert operations.
This infiltration explains the lack of mainstream coverage on important upcoming dates and events. Instead, news cycles fixate on sensational stories about political figures.
The CIA's efforts extend beyond media manipulation. They're engaging in what they term "citizen diplomacy" or "public diplomacy" - essentially propaganda aimed at the American public. This brainwashing campaign treats citizens like foreign adversaries.
Congress faces pressure too. Aerospace companies threaten to withdraw campaign contributions from representatives who push for disclosure. Their goal is to secure private patents on advanced technologies.
We're seeing a multi-pronged approach to information control:
Media infiltration
Public propaganda campaigns
Political pressure and threats
Diversion through sensationalized news
Despite these tactics, key information is publicly available for those who know where to look. Relevant laws and deadlines are outlined in official documents like the National Defense Authorization Act.
Public Views and Media Independence
The government's influence on mainstream media has become increasingly apparent. We've uncovered evidence of intelligence agencies placing operatives within major news organizations, violating the National Security Act of 1947. This infiltration allows them to control which national security stories are published and which are suppressed.
Independent media platforms like podcasts and YouTube channels have become crucial for sharing important information that mainstream outlets won't cover. However, this can lead to skepticism about the credibility of these stories simply due to their source.
The National Defense Authorization Act contains provisions requiring the release of certain classified information by October 18, 2024. Despite its significance, mainstream media has largely ignored this deadline. No countdown clocks or regular updates appear on major news programs.
Private aerospace corporations exert pressure on Congress members through campaign contributions, aiming to keep certain technologies secret for patent purposes. This financial leverage impacts legislative decisions and public disclosures.
The Senate appears more supportive of transparency, while some House members face conflicts of interest due to industry funding. Further public hearings may occur to address these issues and push for adherence to the mandated disclosure timeline.
Legal Framework
National Security Law of 1947
The National Security Law of 1947 plays a crucial role in regulating intelligence activities and government transparency. This legislation prohibits certain agencies from engaging in domestic propaganda or attempting to influence public opinion within the United States. Despite these restrictions, there have been concerns about potential violations, particularly regarding the placement of intelligence personnel within major news organizations.
Defense Budget Authorization Provisions
Recent defense budget authorization bills have included significant provisions related to government transparency and information disclosure. The latest legislation mandates the transfer of specific data to the National Archives within a 300-day timeframe. This requirement covers a wide range of previously classified information.
Key aspects of these provisions include:
A 300-day deadline for information transfer
Involvement of multiple government agencies
Potential impact on private aerospace corporations
We expect these developments to have far-reaching implications for public access to sensitive information and congressional oversight of national security matters.
Congressional Dynamics and Aerospace Industry Influence
We've uncovered some intriguing developments regarding Congressional interactions with the aerospace industry. A key date to watch is October 18, 2024. This stems from legislation passed in December 2023 requiring certain information to be transmitted to the National Archives within 300 days.
The aerospace industry wields significant influence over some members of Congress. Private corporations in this sector are eager to secure patents on emerging technologies. As a result, they're applying pressure by threatening to withdraw campaign contributions from representatives who push for greater transparency.
This dynamic is particularly evident in the House of Representatives. The chair of the House Armed Services Committee, for instance, receives substantial funding from major aerospace firms. These companies prefer to maintain secrecy around certain innovations to protect their potential patents.
The Senate, in contrast, appears more supportive of disclosure efforts. We anticipate further public hearings, likely on the Senate side, to counterbalance the influence of aerospace interests in the House.
These hearings may aim to pressure the small group of House members closely tied to aerospace corporations. The goal would be to ensure compliance with the legislation's disclosure requirements by the October deadline.
Upcoming Public Hearing and Senate Involvement
A significant date looms on the horizon: October 18, 2024. This marks 300 days from when the National Defense Authorization Act was signed into law on December 22, 2023. The Act mandates the transmission of UFO-related information to the National Security Archives by this deadline.
We anticipate another public hearing in Congress before this date arrives. The Senate is expected to take the lead in applying pressure on certain House members who may be reluctant to support full disclosure. These representatives allegedly receive substantial funding from aerospace corporations that prefer to keep this information under wraps for potential patent purposes.
The Senate has shown strong support for transparency in this matter. They aim to counter the influence of private interests and ensure compliance with the law's disclosure requirements. This upcoming hearing will likely focus on pushing for timely and comprehensive release of information to the public.
It's worth noting that October 18 falls shortly before the U.S. election. Despite this timing, there are no indications of plans to postpone the deadline. The countdown to this pivotal date continues, even if mainstream media outlets have been surprisingly quiet about its approach.
Countdown to Government UFO Disclosure
October 18, 2024 marks a pivotal date for UFO disclosure. On this day, the U.S. government is required to transmit all available information about unidentified aerial phenomena to the National Security Archives. This deadline stems from legislation passed by Congress and signed into law on December 22, 2023.
The National Defense Authorization Act includes specific provisions mandating this disclosure. Section 1833 gives government agencies 300 days from enactment to gather and prepare all relevant UFO data for release. Despite the significance of this impending revelation, there has been a surprising lack of mainstream media coverage.
We've learned that several factors may be contributing to the public's limited awareness:
Defense and intelligence agencies have allegedly worked to discredit those discussing the topic seriously.
Claims of CIA operatives embedded in major news outlets to influence reporting on national security matters.
Aerospace industry lobbyists reportedly pressuring Congress members to limit disclosure.
The push for transparency faces opposition from private aerospace corporations seeking to patent advanced technologies. This has created tension between disclosure advocates and those with vested interests in maintaining secrecy.
As the October deadline approaches, we may see increased congressional activity, particularly in the Senate, to ensure compliance with the disclosure requirements. The coming months could prove critical in determining the extent and impact of the mandated UFO information release.
Impact on the Upcoming US Elections
The October 18th, 2024 deadline for disclosure of UFO-related information could significantly influence the upcoming US elections. This date, just weeks before Election Day, may become a focal point for voters and candidates alike.
We expect increased public interest and media coverage as the deadline approaches. Candidates may be pressed to address their stance on government transparency and UFO disclosure during debates and campaign events.
The timing could create a unique dynamic in the electoral landscape:
Voters might prioritize candidates who support full disclosure
Some politicians may use the issue to differentiate themselves
Debates could feature questions about UFO information and national security
It's possible that last-minute revelations could sway undecided voters or energize certain segments of the electorate. The disclosure's proximity to Election Day might also lead to speculation about its political motivations.
Campaign strategies may need to adapt quickly to incorporate this issue. We anticipate:
Increased discussion of government secrecy
Debates on the role of intelligence agencies in public information
Questions about aerospace industry influence on policy
The UFO disclosure deadline adds an unexpected element to an already complex election season. Its effects on voter behavior and campaign messaging remain to be seen, but it will likely be a topic of intense scrutiny in the final weeks before Americans head to the polls.
