Danny Sheehan LEAKS Alien DNA From Bodies Of Crashed UFOs Exists
In a recent appearance on a podcast, Danny Shean, the attorney for Luis Elizondo, brought forth a series of remarkable revelations. Shean spoke of alien DNA evidence allegedly in the possession of the US Senate Armed Services Committee. Intriguingly, Shean mentioned Colonel Grush's sworn testimony about the US having non-human extraterrestrial spacecrafts and bodies, results supported by DNA tests indicating non-human origins. Shean’s bombshell claims venture into the realms of the unknown, prompting questions about the veracity and implications of such information, its potential impacts on society, and government transparency in UFO disclosures.
The conversation further explored the legal mechanisms analogous to UFO disclosure processes. Shean's dialogue with podcaster Danny Jones touched upon the evidentiary strength of whistleblower testimonies and the legal powers granted to the Senate Intelligence Committee to demand full disclosure. The Committee's subpoena powers, the authority to conduct interrogations under oath, and the right to claim eminent domain over extraterrestrial materials were dissected, illustrating a legal framework poised for enforcing transparency in matters often shrouded in secrecy.
Key Takeaways
Alien DNA evidence and testimony about non-human extraterrestrial spacecraft are claimed to be held by the US Senate Armed Services Committee.
The legal process surrounding the disclosure of UFO-related information includes subpoena power and the right of eminent domain for the Senate Intelligence Committee.
The podcast highlighted the challenges in eliciting detailed exploration of these claims during the interview, leaving the public curious about the depth and implications of the revelations.
Overview of Key Personalities in UFO Discourse: Danny Sheehan & Luis Elizondo
Danny Sheehan:
Profession: Harvard-educated attorney
Notable Engagement: He represented Luis Elizondo and appeared as a guest on a podcast where he discussed extraordinary claims regarding extraterrestrial life.
Claims: Alleged the existence of alien DNA evidence acknowledged by the US Senate Armed Services Committee.
Luis Elizondo:
Role: Client of Danny Sheehan.
Significance: Former head of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), a secretive Pentagon unit investigating UFOs.
Recent Assertions by Danny Sheehan:
Statements on Extraterrestrial Craft and Alien DNA: Revealed a claim about the US being in possession of extraterrestrial spacecraft and non-human bodies, supported by DNA tests.
Number of Witnesses: Cited a substantial claim involving approximately 40 witnesses, detailing their involvement with UFO disclosure.
Legal Perspective:
Illustration: Sheehan drew a comparison between believing multiple witnesses in a hypothetical burglary case and the credence given to the multitude of witnesses in the matter of UFOs and extraterrestrial evidence.
Legislative Action: Discussed the impact of recent legal measures, attempting to compel full disclosure of UFO information to the American public.
UFO Disclosure Proceedings:
Senate Intelligence Committee Role:
Belief in Witnesses: Acknowledged as believing the testimony of witnesses regarding UFOs.
Legislation Passed: Passing of statutes aiming for full disclosure to the public.
Search Warrant and Subpoena Power:
Focus: Discussion around the potential for search warrants and use of subpoena power in relation to UFO evidence, particularly in noteworthy locations like Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.
Eminent Domain: Reference to the power vested in authorities to seize evidence related to extraterrestrial encounters.
Danny Sheehan's Claims:
Expressed frustration over the lack of immediate and wide-ranging action given the purported evidence of alien DNA and its implications.
Raised questions about the need for visual confirmation like photographs, especially if the Senate Armed Services Committee indeed has access to such definitive proof.
Engagement with Podcast Host:
Sheehan addressed perceived lack of follow-up on critical points about alien DNA evidence during the interview.
Emphasized that the revelation about alien DNA should be considered a significant and singular story, expressing the wish for a deeper exploration on that topic by the podcast host.
Allegations of Extraterrestrial Genetic Material and Oversight by the US Legislature
Testimonial of Col. Grush and Genetic Findings
During an official meeting supervised by the House Oversight Committee, Col. Grush provided testimony under oath explaining the possession of non-human spacecraft and associated remains by the US authorities. Genetic analysis has substantiated claims that these remains are not human. This information is held by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Col. Grush cited that the total number of testimonies backing these findings numbers 40.
Function of the Senate Committee on Armed Services
The Senate Committee on Armed Services is recognized as the deliberative body that has granted credibility to these witnesses' testimonies. As a result, legislation has been passed mandating comprehensive disclosure of such sensitive information to the US public. This response is crafted to address federal transparency and public policy formulation regarding such disclosures.
Enforcement Actions: Subpoenas and Federal Expropriation
The Senate has enacted a statute which functions akin to a search warrant. This legislation, ratified by the Senate, empowers the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence with subpoena authority. The committee is thereby authorized to demand the submission of specified data, conduct sworn depositions, and hold individuals accountable under penalty of perjury for failure to comply. Moreover, the power of eminent domain is conferred upon the legislative body, allowing them to requisition the disputed spacecrafts, biological materials, or any other relevant evidentiary items for Congressional possession. This ensures adherence to constitutional provisions which vest oversight responsibilities with the elected legislative branch, distinct from appointed defense department officials.
Examination of Podcast Interview Methods
Unexplored Investigative Inquiries
Missed Opportunities in Questioning:
Shean revealed potentially significant information about non-human DNA and the U.S. Senate's knowledge of it.
Despite the gravity of these claims, further details or corroborative evidence were not pursued in the conversation.
Moderator's Reaction to Contentious Statements
Table of Unaddressed Points:
Claim by Shean Expected Host Inquiry Actual Host Reaction Non-human DNA evidence is held by the Senate Intelligence Committee. Inquiry into the existence, access to, and conclusions of DNA tests. The host transitioned from the topic without further probing. A call for full disclosure to the American public. Questions regarding action plans post-disclosure. Only brief acknowledgement with no follow-up questions. Assertion of eminent domain rights over extraterrestrial crafts. Clarification on the legitimacy and impact of such legal actions. The topic was shifted away from without discussion of its implications.
Points of Interest Bullet Points:
Shean's assertion of possession of non-human spacecraft was a pivotal moment, meriting in-depth discussion, which was not given due focus.
Rather than addressing Shean's claims with skepticism or support, the host chose to direct the conversation elsewhere.
Conversation with Jeremy Riss
In the course of a recent exchange, Jeremy Riss offered insights predicated on his extensive historical knowledge of UFO phenomena. The dialogue encompassed a comparison between the procedural logic employed in conventional criminal proceedings and witness testimonies linked to UFO sightings. Highlighting a scenario where a hypothetical burglary with two eyewitnesses would lead to a conviction, the analogy was drawn to elicit clarity on the credibility of numerous individuals asserting encounters with unidentified flying objects.
Speaking from a legal standpoint, Riss inquired about the disparity between the substantial number of witnesses—a figure cited to be as many as forty—and the apparent inertia in garnering substantial government and public scrutiny. The conversation pivoted to the recent legislative undertakings, wherein a statute was discussed. This statute was metaphorically likened to a search warrant authorized by the Senate intelligence committee, endorsed by the Senate, and compelled a disclosure of information to the National Archives.
An emphasis was laid on the procedural dynamics, including the potential employment of subpoena power, deposition questions under oath, and, notably, the invocation of eminent domain. This perspective underscored the prerogative to mandate the surrender of unidentified crafts and related biological materials, essentially equipping congressional authorities with a robust mechanism to assert control over the possession and examination of such enigmatic artifacts.
However, towards the closing fragments of the discourse, an undertone of skepticism surfaced regarding the actual enforcement of such powers, insinuating that the anticipated assertiveness may have been diluted in practical application. Nevertheless, the perceived dissonance between possessing substantial testimonial evidence, including alleged alien DNA test results, and the consequent lack of transformative governmental actions became a locus of perplexity for Riss, who juxtaposed this with the ostensible gravity such evidence should ostensibly bear in governmental precincts.
Evaluating Legal Procedures Relative to Extraterrestrial Evidence Disclosure
The legal mechanisms surrounding the unveiling of unidentified flying object (UFO) particulars present a notable parallel to standard judicial proceedings. In a recent discourse, Luis Elizondo's attorney, Daniel Sheehan, related extraordinary developments pertaining to extraterrestrial evidence. Sheehan's revelations revolve around purported alien DNA, with implications reaching high-level governmental panels, specifically the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee.
Conveyance of Testimony: Sheehan points to Colonel Grush's sworn testimony regarding the possession of non-human extraterrestrial craft and bodies. Tests have reportedly confirmed non-human DNA, a matter that Sheehan suggests deserves public scrutiny.
Volume of Witnesses: Pertinent to this subject, the number of individuals providing corroborative accounts is substantial, reaching forty. This collective testimony holds significant weight within the context of legal validation.
Legislative Actions and Powers: Sheehan likens recent legislative efforts to a search warrant issued by Congressional authority. The disclosure statute allegedly empowers the Senate intelligence committee to compel the release of information, exercising their subpoena power and facilitating sworn depositions.
Search Warrant Analogy: The principle of a search warrant is invoked to outline the potential for obtaining verified sightings from restricted locales, specifically pointing out Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and the Battelle Memorial Institute.
Constitutional Considerations: Emphasizing the constitutional obligation, Sheehan argues the necessity for governmental transparency and accountability, noting that employing the power of eminent domain for evidence retrieval stands as a constitutional prerogative.
Realpolitik of Authority: Despite the outlined procedural potential, Sheehan's comments reflect a certain skepticism about the actual implementation of these powers. A sentiment echoes throughout the dialogue, highlighting disjunctions between legislative intent and executive action.
As a Harvard-trained legal counsel, Sheehan articulates a comparison between the legal accountability measures in hypothetical property violations and the observed practices in the UFO disclosure process. This analogy is drawn to underscore the legitimacy of witness testimonies and to question why equivalent legal scrutiny has not been fully realized concerning extraterrestrial evidence.
Understanding the Extent of Legislative Authority
Legislative Body's Direct Influence
The extent to which a legislative body can influence and facilitate oversight is substantial. In the case of extraterrestrial evidence, such influence becomes pivotal. If there exists testimony or physical evidence suggesting non-human entities or technology, a legislative committee has the authority to demand access to such data. Investigations into such extraordinary claims would typically involve gathering testimonies from credible witnesses and, where applicable, subpoenaing documents or other physical evidence. This thorough examination by a legislative body ensures all available information is considered in any official inquiry.
Relevant Committee Involvement:
Oversight in testimonial hearings: 40 witnesses testifying under oath.
Compulsory data disclosure: Ensuring entities reveal pertinent information to legislative inquiries.
Effects of Legislative Amendments
When an amendment aimed to enhance disclosure and transparency concerning non-human entities is introduced, its effectiveness can be mitigated through a process known as 'gutting'. Such a gutting process would result in the amendment lacking the necessary teeth to enforce full disclosure. This neutering of legislative power would mean that capabilities like issuing search warrants, harnessing eminent domain, or compelling testimonies under threat of perjury become nullified. The intended powers that would allow for comprehensive investigation and holding entities accountable for withholding information would effectively be eroded.
Legislated Powers and Their Limitations:
Intended Power Status After Amendment 'Gutting' Subpoena Power Nullified Eminent Domain Removed Enforcement of Disclosures Ineffective
The proposed amendment originally would have granted the legislative body the capability to conduct thorough investigations into classified locations such as the Blue Room at Wright Patterson Air Force Base or Patel Memorial Institute. However, without these powers, the legislative body’s ability to act on witness testimonies and demand accountability is significantly diminished.
Conclusion: Effects of Newly Disclosed Data
Recent discourse has centered around statements made by the attorney, Danny Shean, in a podcast discussion. His proclamations included references to extraterrestrial technology and biological specimens being in the hands of the US government. Asserting that Colonel Grush has delivered a testimony to a House Oversight Committee confirming possession of non-human spacecraft and biologically non-human entities, these claims, if substantiated, stand to substantially alter contemporary scientific and historical understanding.
Key Points:
There is mention of DNA evidence confirming non-human origin.
Forty individuals are cited as witnesses corroborating these assertions.
Senate Intelligence Committee reportedly has access to this evidence.
Implications Discussed:
A statutory order issued by the Senate Intelligence Committee purportedly enables legal requests for information disclosure.
This includes the power to subpoena witnesses and information, implying pressure for transparency.
The discussion also tackled operational nuances within the government structure, touching on the practical exercise of power, including eminent domain and subpoena capabilities. An emphasis on the constitutional obligation to inform Congress was noted. Furthermore, calls for full disclosure to the American populace were highlighted, suggesting a desire for a broader public engagement with the topic.
This discourse prompts a re-evaluation of policy, privacy, and the broad implications of potential evidence that could influence our understanding of our place within a wider cosmic context. The veracity of these claims and the subsequent government reaction remain central to ongoing inquiry and public interest.
Source Links
Danny Sheehan FULL Interview on Danny Jones Podcast: https://youtu.be/a1kespVSrfY?si=ZSIgCIfSj2TSLGv_
