CIA Agent REVEALS We Test Humans For Alien DNA
In the intriguing world of extraterrestrial research, recent discussions have stirred the public's imagination with an astonishing claim: a CIA agent allegedly informed Sean Espor Hargens that a DNA test could be conducted on humans to detect the presence of alien DNA. This revelation, made on the Danny Jones podcast, challenges our understanding of human genetics and our place in the cosmos. Exploring over 35 different theories around extraterrestrial life forms, Hargens maps out a diverse range of possibilities. These theories span various hypotheses, including time travelers, crypto-terrestrials, and interdimensional beings, each presenting unique characteristics and intentions.
The conversation also delves into the strict standards of scientific evidence versus the more accessible thresholds of legal evidence. Hargens argues for a nuanced approach to evaluating extraterrestrial encounters, recognizing the role of eyewitness testimony, physical traces, and archaeological anomalies in constructing a compelling, albeit non-conclusive, case for alien visitation. While the scientific community demands irrefutable proof, the legal system often operates on a balance of probabilities, lending credibility to the multiple accounts of otherworldly experiences shared by numerous individuals.
Key Takeaways
A CIA agent's claim about testing humans for alien DNA raises profound questions about our biological origins.
Over 35 theories exist about extraterrestrial entities, suggesting a complex array of interstellar and interdimensional presence.
The debate over the sufficiency of evidence for extraterrestrial existence continues, contrasting scientific rigor with legal standards.
Sean's Astonishing Disclosures
While participating in a podcast, I mentioned an insightful discussion with a CIA agent who shared information about a DNA assessment designed to determine if humans possess extraterrestrial genetic markers. This revelation implies that considerable efforts have been undertaken to understand our DNA in relation to potential alien ancestry.
Table of Theories and Associated Variables
Theory Source Consciousness Body Type Intention Dimensionality Time Traveler Various Timelines Varied Varied Diverse Temporal Crypto-Terrestrial Earth Distinct Indigenous Hidden Terrestrial Ultra-Terrestrial Beyond Earth Enhanced Non-standard Inscrutable Higher Dimensions Extraterrestrial Other Planets Advanced Various Multifarious Interstellar
Enumerating over 35 different hypotheses regarding the identity and intentions of hypothetical non-human entities, I highlighted the diversity and complexity inherent in this field of study. These theories encompass a range of possibilities, indicating that we may be encountering a wide array of beings from different origins and dimensions—all concurrently active and interacting with us in various ways.
I go on to contest the notion that conventional evidence is inadequate in supporting the existence of extraterrestrial life. Examples drawn from legal standards illustrate how witness testimonies can be powerful and convincing, capable of determining outcomes in legal contexts even without tangible evidence like a weapon in a murder case.
In a similar vein, while scientific proof remains the gold standard, the legal system’s reliance on witness accounts raises questions about the validity of multiple credible eyewitness experiences. People’s personal encounters and stories, when amassed, create a compelling narrative that should not be readily dismissed.
Scientific Vs. Anecdotal Evidence
Type Description Usage Scientific Evidence Requires physical proof and empirical data High standard in scientific communities Anecdotal/Witness Testimony Based on personal stories and experiences Highly regarded in legal systems
As for the physical traces left by these encounters, although there is no definitive "smoking gun," a multitude of suggestive evidence exists. From abnormal tree growth patterns at documented encounter sites to irregularities found on and around individuals with alleged abduction experiences, physical clues are present. They, alongside archaeological, sociological, and experiential reports, contribute to a substantial body of evidence that, while not conclusive on its own, carries significant weight when taken cumulatively.
This nuanced understanding of evidence and reality reflects my call for an interdisciplinary approach to studying these phenomena, emphasizing the potential truth behind these diverse encounters and experiences with the unknown.
Overview of the Danny Jones Podcast
Sean Espor Hargens recently appeared on the podcast hosted by Danny Jones, discussing a range of topics related to extraterrestrial life and unidentified phenomena. Hargens brought up an astonishing concept during his conversation, disclosing that a CIA agent informed him about a DNA test used to identify potential alien DNA in humans.
Key Discussion Points:
Various theories of extraterrestrial identity were highlighted, including travelers through time, beings from other planes of existence, and those from different dimensions or planets.
The podcast touched on the notion of scientific evidence versus legal evidence, emphasizing that witness testimony, despite its weight in the legal system, is largely disregarded in the scientific community when it comes to proving the existence of extraterrestrial life.
Physical evidence associated with alleged encounters, such as environmental anomalies, physiological changes, and technological interactions, was discussed, though Hargens noted the absence of a definitive "smoking gun."
The conversation also explored the diversity and creativity of the cosmos, suggesting that multiple theories about extraterrestrial entities could simultaneously hold validity.
Throughout the exchange, the interchange between Hargens and Jones was underscored by a shared curiosity regarding the standards of evidence used to substantiate claims of extraterrestrial contact and the broader implications for understanding our place in the universe. They posited that while scientific validation remains elusive, there is a multitude of indirect evidence that, when pieced together, constructs a compelling narrative worth further investigation.
Examining Ancestral Origins: Beyond Human Genes
A reputed CIA operative has disclosed an extraordinary detail involving a specialized DNA examination which is applied to individuals to ascertain the presence of non-human genetic markers. This DNA analysis detects genetic variants that may not align with known human DNA sequences, suggesting possible extraterrestrial origins.
Understanding the Fragments from Beyond
The foundation of this intriguing procedure is the belief in the varied theories of non-human entities that humans have speculated about. Some of these include:
Interstellar Visitors: Hypothesized beings from distant galaxies.
Otherworldly Inhabitants: The notion that intelligent life shares our planet in hidden forms.
Dimensional Voyagers: Beings from different dimensions intersecting with ours.
Historical Travelers: Entities that transcend the conventional understanding of time.
Each of these theories highlights unique characteristics and intentions of these beings, with over 25 distinct variables identified through comprehensive analysis.
Criteria and Evidence
Variable Description Origin The presumed starting point of these entities, be it extraterrestrial or interdimensional. Consciousness The level and type of awareness these beings possess. Physicality Descriptions of bodily forms, if any. Intention The apparent purpose or agenda behind interactions with humans.
A convergence of these 35 different hypotheses paints a complex mosaic of potential truths, indicating that we may indeed be witnessing a multiplicity of extraterrestrial interactions.
Legal vs. Scientific Proof
In the realm of evidence, a distinction is drawn between what would satisfy a court of law versus the rigorous standards of science. Witnesses to supposed extraterrestrial phenomena offer compelling narratives that, while possibly influencing legal judgments, do not meet the higher bar of scientific validation.
Testimonies and Physical Traces:
Personal Accounts: Numerous individuals recount extraordinary experiences, often matching in detail.
Bodily Evidence: Unexplained scars, marks, and similar signs found on abductees.
Environmental Imprints: Anomalies such as accelerated tree growth patterns near supposed UFO landing sites, potentially linked to radiation.
While no definitive proof, i.e., a "smoking gun," has been presented to solidify these theories, the aggregation of evidence bears noteworthy implications, encouraging further inquiry and examination.
A Potential Breakthrough
Advancements in scientific methodology may soon bring us closer to disclosing solid proof — physical remains or artifacts left by extraterrestrial encounters that provide tangible evidence of their existence. Until then, it remains an open question, one that continues to fascinate and challenge our understanding of the cosmos.
Theories of Extranormal Origins and Influential Factors
In the realm of anomalous research, a spectrum of hypotheses has been posited to explain the origins and nature of ostensibly otherworldly beings. Essential to this exploratory work is an "integral approach," which enables the researcher to catalog and analyze these hypotheses systematically. The range of theories alludes to beings characterized as time travelers, beings tied to Earth yet concealed (often referred to as crypto-terrestrial), beings from beyond our Earthly realm (extraterrestrial), and beings from alternate dimensions or planes of existence (interdimensional), alongside a multitude of sociocultural interpretations of these entities.
When evaluating these theories, it is important to consider multiple variables that help differentiate and categorize these hypotheses. These variables include, but are not limited to:
Origin: Where do these beings supposedly stem from?
Consciousness: What kind of awareness or sentience do they possess?
Physiology: What is the nature of their physical bodies, if they exist?
Intention: What are their objectives or reasons for interaction, if any?
This analytical exercise reveals the distinction between beings supposedly hailing from various locales such as other planets within our cosmos, those that may traverse or inhabit other dimensions, and those living undiscovered on our planet. The integral approach entails the examination of these variables across 25 different possibilities.
Interestingly, these variables, when combined with the diversified theories, reflect a kaleidoscope of potential realities. Each theory attempts to encapsulate one or more aspects of the enigma, suggesting that there may be truth in multiple or even all scenarios within this expansive catalog of extranormal beings.
The discourse on evidence regarding the existence of such entities is nuanced, where scientific criteria for proof are rigorous and significantly distinct from legal standards. In the legal realm, witness testimonies and circumstantial evidence carry substantial weight. In contrast, the scientific community demands tangible, empirical evidence which has yet to be unequivocally presented. Despite this, numerous kinds of evidence including archaeological records, sociological studies, and reports from individuals claiming to have had direct experiences (abductees) have all contributed to a body of work that, while not definitively conclusive, suggests the possibility of non-human intelligences interacting with our species.
Physical evidence has been documented in several forms such as unexplained marks on the land, anomalies in flora indicative of unusual radiation exposure, distinct scars or materials (implants) recovered from individuals, and various distortive effects upon machinery or vehicles. These elements, although not corroborating the existence of extranormal entities beyond question, impose upon the researcher the duty to consider the collective implications rather than dismiss them outright due to the absence of incontrovertible proof.
Potential for Alien Life
Examining the spectrum of alien life theories reveals a complex mosaic of possibilities, touching on the origins, consciousness, physical forms, and intentions of otherworldly beings. These theories range widely, encapsulating concepts such as time-traveling entities, beings from hidden terrestrial realms, extraterrestrial life from other planets, and interdimensional travelers, all bringing forward unique narratives that contribute to a larger discourse on cosmic diversity.
Unpacking the numerous hypotheses regarding alien presence, attention is drawn to the categorization of over thirty-five distinct theories. Each concept unravels a series of variables such as cosmic geography, levels of consciousness, and physicality. When these variables are considered, they map onto a collection of twenty-five broader scenarios, suggesting that the multitude of theories may collectively cover the breadth of possible alien existences.
Evidence in Support
When investigating evidence for alien life, one must distinguish between scientific and legal standards. Scientific evidence demands rigorous empirical proof, while legal evidence relies heavily on testimonial accounts and circumstantial facts. Instances in which individuals attest to encounters with extraterrestrial or unconventional beings bear considerable weight in legal contexts but often fail to satisfy scientific criteria.
Physical Indicators and Anomalies
Although a definitive artifact or 'smoking gun' remains elusive, multiple forms of physical evidence linked to alleged extraterrestrial incidents have surfaced. Abduction narratives occasionally correlate with tangible traces such as unusual body marks or environmental anomalies. For example, abnormal growth patterns in tree rings have been documented following certain reported encounters, hinting at anomalous environmental influences such as atypical radiation levels.
Moreover, the existence of unexplained artifacts said to be of alien origin, including implants or materials associated with unidentified aerial phenomena, bolsters the collection of physical data. While these pieces of evidence fail to unequivocally confirm the existence of alien life, their collective weight points toward plausibility, inviting continued exploration and analysis.
Varied Experiences and Observations
Reflecting on personal accounts, we must acknowledge that they permeate societal constructs and influence collective understanding. The diversity of encounters and testimonies serves as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of human perception, challenging us to consider the numerous and overlapping threads of possibility within the search for extraterrestrial life.
Sean's Personal Theory
Examination of Alleged Alien DNA in Humans
In a recent conversation, Sean enlightened listeners about an intriguing claim regarding a DNA test devised to detect extraterrestrial genetic material in humans. According to Sean, a CIA source has confirmed the use of this test, sparking a flurry of questions about its methodology and the criteria for alien DNA identification.
Sean's Exploration of Extraterrestrial Theories
Sean's scholarly endeavor to comprehend extraterrestrial phenomena encompasses a comprehensive review of over 35 theories concerning extraterrestrial entities. These theories examine a variety of questions, such as their origins, consciousness levels, physical forms, and objectives.
Variable to Consider Possible Origin Consciousness Type Origin Story Local Conscious Physical Form Extraterrestrial Unconscious Intentions Interdimensional Variable
Sean has meticulously charted these concepts against a multitude of variables. His analysis reveals that collectively, these theories encompass approximately 25 distinct possibilities about these otherworldly beings. Interestingly, Sean perceives this tapestry of hypotheses as not mutually exclusive but rather as potentially coexisting realities.
The Evidence Debate and Its Implications
Sean delves into the contentious debate over the existence of extraterrestrials and the nature of evidence required to substantiate such claims. He draws a crucial distinction between scientific proof and what is considered admissible in legal proceedings.
Types of Evidence Discussed by Sean:
Scientific Evidence: Demands concrete, replicable findings.
Legal Evidence: Includes witness testimony and is often deemed sufficient in court.
Sean argues that numerous experiences and sightings, while not meeting scientific rigor, could be valid in a legal framework. Reiterating the importance of witness accounts, he likens their potential impact on a trial to that of physical evidence in resolving legal disputes.
Physical Evidence and Inductive Reasoning in the UFO Phenomenon
Sean acknowledges the absence of a definitive "smoking gun" but emphasizes the existence of various forms of physical evidence related to UFO encounters. He cites examples such as irregular tree growth patterns near alleged UFO landing sites, unexplained marks on both people and objects, and recovered implants.
Instances of Unusual Physical Evidence:
Anomalous burns on vegetation.
Varying tree ring growth in areas of reported extraterrestrial activity.
Unexplained physical marks and recovered artifacts that could be linked to abductions.
Sean suggests that these points of evidence, while not conclusively proving alien visitation, are nevertheless compelling when combined. He draws from inductive reasoning, illustrating how these patterns of evidence could contribute to a highly probable conclusion about the existence of extraterrestrial life.
Difficulties in Validating Scientific Proof
Scientific inquiry grapples with the substantial task of distinguishing between verifiable fact and mere conjecture. For instance, the debate on extraterrestrial life encompasses a wide spectrum of hypotheses, ranging from time travel to crypto-terrestrial to ultraterrestrial beings. The proliferation of theories over the past twenty years has cumulatively addressed numerous variables, such as the origins, consciousness, bodily forms, and intentions of these entities. This aggregation of theories mirrors the complexity inherent in the universe and suggests a multitude of beings possibly interacting with humanity.
The assertion of alien DNA presence within humans is just one facet of this broader dialogue, shedding light on the need for a multi-pronged evidence approach. The prevailing standards for evidence, however, diverge significantly across disciplines. In the realm of science, the quest for irrefutable 'smoking gun’ evidence remains unfulfilled. Without tangible artifacts or incontrovertible data, scientific validation remains out of reach, emphasizing the rigorous bar science sets for confirming the existence of extraterrestrial life.
Conversely, the legal system relies on a different echelon of proof, where witness testimony and indirect evidence often suffice for a conviction. This dichotomy raises pivotal questions about the disparity in evidentiary standards. Why is the phenomenon of extraterrestrial life solely held to the criterion of scientific scrutiny and not legal justification? In matters of legislative action and resource allocation, adjusting evidentiary expectations could yield different outcomes.
Despite the absence of a definitive artifact, a plethora of circumstantial evidence still warrants consideration. For example, individuals reporting abductions offer narratives that contribute to the collective data, even in the absence of physical evidence. Other compelling pieces of the puzzle include abnormal tree ring growth near supposed UFO encounters and physical anomalies present in both the environment and on individuals’ bodies, such as burns, scars, or traces on surfaces. These suggestive clues, while not conclusive, beckon a cautious consideration rather than outright dismissal, paralleling the evidentiary synthesis employed in legal judgments.
In conclusion, ascertaining the existence of extraterrestrial entities is a process fraught with challenges. The endeavour demands not only a deeper scientific examination but also a more nuanced understanding of evidence that transcends disciplinary boundaries.
Comparing Judicial and Scientific Evidentiary Thresholds
When considering the distinct nature of judicial evidence in comparison to the rigorous requirements of scientific proof, one finds that the two realms operate under vastly different standards. In legal contexts, for instance, testimonies from witnesses can be incredibly influential. Witness statements may carry significant weight in determining the outcomes of trials, ranging from minor infractions to capital offenses. A credible eyewitness can profoundly impact a case. In contrast, the scientific community places little emphasis on anecdotal evidence, regardless of the observer's credibility. Instead, scientific validation demands tangible, empirical proof that can withstand strict methodological scrutiny.
Legal evidence encompasses a spectrum of materials, from personal accounts to circumstantial findings, which collectively can lead to a verdict even in the absence of concrete objects such as a murder weapon. The legal system often relies on a synthesis of eyewitness reports and contextual evidence to arrive at a judgement. This reliance forms the backbone of societal trust in the judicial process, suggesting that standards of proof in a court diverge markedly from those upheld by scientific inquiry.
In the scientific realm, the quest for proof necessitates physical evidence. An exhaustive scientific analysis might include a broad range of data points, from archaeological finds to patterns observed in social behavior. Reported encounters, such as those described by abductees, bring forth a myriad of physical markers - like burns, scars, or residual effects on vegetation and objects - that provide a mosaic of evidence. These indicators, while falling short of a definitive 'smoking gun,' do not diminish their potential value in constructing a cogent narrative grounded in scientific methodologies and logical reasoning.
Addressing phenomena that lack the proverbial 'smoking gun,' a term often evoked to signify irrefutable proof, poses a unique challenge. The rigor of scientific validation demands the presence of solid, undeniable artifacts or phenomena – a hurdle not easily surmounted. However, even without the conclusive 'smoking gun,' the compilation of auxiliary evidence, if scrutinized logically and methodically, can lead us to strongly suggestive conclusions. This approach mirrors the legal principle of building a case based on the preponderance of evidence rather than awaiting a single unequivocal piece of proof.
Reliability of Firsthand Accounts in Extraterrestrial Research
When evaluating the presence of extraterrestrial beings, one discovers an extensive range of hypotheses. Notably, theories such as time travel entities, beings from Earth's hidden civilizations, outsiders from other planets, and interdimensional travelers are under constant discussion. This exploration of otherworldly encounters has produced about thirty-five distinct theories over time, each attempting to decipher the nature, origins, and intentions of these entities.
Through methodical analysis, multiple factors are highlighted in these theories, such as the entities' consciousness, bodily forms, and purposes. By analyzing eight variables across several theories, one finds that nearly twenty-five different attributes of these beings are postulated. It suggests that the divergent narratives of extraterrestrial encounters may each hold a fragment of truth, revealing the complex tapestry of cosmic diversity.
The legal realm often accepts eyewitness accounts as substantial evidence. Similarly, in the search for extraterrestrial life, firsthand accounts of encounters could be valuable. Scientific standards demand tangible proof, yet legal standards could endorse the credibility of an eyewitness. In numerous situations, the eyewitness' account is pivotal to legal outcomes, a standard that should be considered when debating the existence of extraterrestrial life.
The field of extraterrestrial studies inevitably encounters challenges with verifying the existence of life beyond Earth due to a lack of concrete evidence. Nevertheless, there is an abundance of anecdotal and physical traces that merit consideration. For instance, individuals claiming to have been abducted present curious physiological marks or recount experiences with an impressive level of detail, suggesting an encounter with the unknown. Additionally, environmental anomalies, such as irregularities in vegetation or unexplained artifacts, provide circumstantial evidence. Such physical signs are not definitive proof but, in conjunction with other observations, contribute to a compelling case for the existence of extraterrestrial life.
Disclosure and Financial Support in Governmental Research
Recent discussions on a widely recognized podcast highlighted intriguing facets of governmental efforts in paranormal research. Among the points raised was the existence of a DNA screening procedure developed to potentially identify extraterrestrial components within human DNA. This claim, derived from a purported exchange with a CIA agent, has generated considerable attention and debate around the methods and rationale of such tests.
The exploration of this phenomenon incorporates an exhaustive array of over 35 hypotheses concerning the origins and natures of potential non-human entities. These range from notions of time-traveling beings to extraterrestrials, each carrying distinct variables such as origin, consciousness, physical form, and intentions. Upon evaluating these hypotheses, a complex matrix emerges where nearly every conceivable combination of defining characteristics has a corresponding theory to match.
This comprehensive categorization underscores the complexity of the phenomenon at hand. The juxtaposition of assorted theories proposes that our universe's diversity may encompass an array of non-human existences, some of which humanity may be interacting with.
In terms of substantiating these assertions, a distinction is drawn between scientific and legal standards of evidence. The former demands rigorous empirical proof, which, to date, has not been satisfactorily met according to some critics. Conversely, the legal sphere, reliant on witness testimonies and circumstantial evidence, may consider the current body of evidence substantial.
Within legal contexts, multiple credible eyewitness accounts are deemed potent, bolstering the argument that such testimony could significantly influence governmental decisions concerning disclosure, legislative actions, and funding allocations. Echoing this perspective, physical evidence — albeit lacking the definitive 'smoking gun' — is abound. This includes anomalies in abductees' accounts, peculiar formations in flora at renowned incident sites, and distinctive artifacts purportedly linked to paranormal encounters.
The discourse on these matters doesn't call for a singular, incontrovertible proof but rather a collective analysis of existing evidence using logical deductive and inductive methods. By juxtaposing scientific rigor with legal pragmatism, the debate continues on what constitutes valid and acceptable proof for the existence of extraterrestrial life.
Examination of Tangible Proofs
In the ongoing quest to understand the mysterious phenomenon often referred to as unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), evidence has surfaced from multiple sources. Sean, during an appearance on a podcast, shared insights into different hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the origins and intentions of these phenomena, ranging from interdimensional beings to time travelers.
He emphasized that while there is no definitive "smoking gun," the cumulative body of evidence, such as physical artifacts from abductee experiences, should not be hastily dismissed. This evidence includes, but is not limited to, unusual marks on the body, implants, and ecological changes in the environment where events purportedly took place, like the accelerated growth of tree rings in proximity to a UAP sighting, possibly due to radiation exposure.
Sean posits that it is essential to employ scientific rigor and logical reasoning when analyzing such incidents. While scientific standards of evidence are stringent, he suggests that the existing pool of physical evidence, when amalgamated with a multitude of experiencer reports, presents a compelling case.
Furthermore, Sean touches upon the complex issue of whether certain humans might possess extraterrestrial DNA, mentioning a test reportedly used by a government agency to detect such anomalies. The validity and methodology of this test are not detailed in current discussions, raising questions about the criteria used to discern alien genetic material.
While scientific validation remains elusive, the breadth of physical traces and witnesses' accounts are indicative of a phenomenon that is both tangible and multifaceted. Thus, the exploration into the unknown continues, with the acknowledgement that current evidence may allude to a diversity of extraordinary entities and events.
Investigative Methodologies in Anomalous Research
In exploring anomalous phenomena, the application of rigorous investigation methods is vital. Researchers in this field apply a systematic approach, akin to the scientific method, which includes the collection of various forms of evidence. This approach embraces both inductive and deductive reasoning to form hypotheses that address the myriad of possible explanations for unidentified phenomena.
Approaches to Theorizing Anomalies:
Mapping Theories:
Over 35 different hypotheses have been proposed.
These encompass various origins and intents of the entities in question.
Variables Analysis:
Analysis includes approx. 25 variables like origin, consciousness, physical form, and intent.
Different theories address the combinations of these variables.
Evidence Examination:
Evidence can range from archaeological to sociological.
Reports from individuals who claim experiences with anomalies are also collected.
Physical traces, such as environmental changes and marks on objects, are also considered.
Evidence Standards:
Scientific Evidence:
Scientific evidence is a stringent requirement that demands verifiable and repeatable findings.
Many pieces of evidence fall short of this high bar, but they are still subject to study.
Legal Evidence:
Lower thresholds than scientific standards.
Includes witness testimonies and circumstantial evidence.
Can be powerful, especially multiple corroborating accounts.
Results of Evidence Analysis:
The Lack of Definitive Proof:
To date, there is no conclusive or "smoking gun" evidence.
However, the accumulation of suggestive evidence cannot be easily dismissed.
Hypothesis Formulation:
The diverse array of evidence leads to a broad range of hypotheses.
No single explanation has been universally accepted.
Anomalies and Tree Growth:
There are instances of anomalies impacting tree growth, suggesting environmental influences.
Researchers in this field often face challenges in reconciling the different standards of evidence. While the lack of definitive proof persists, the use of established investigative methods allows for the construction of theories that attempt to explain the collected evidence in a structured manner. These theories are always subject to further testing and scrutiny as researchers strive for a deeper understanding of the phenomena.
Source Links
Danny Jones Podcast: https://youtu.be/JUMNLy8ODR0?si=N-UNMkXWqLhwCCFQ&t=2742
Vetted Video (Simon Holland - SETI): https://youtu.be/zdyvgFwPFYQ
Vetted Video (Alien DNA Tests WIth Danny Sheehan): https://youtu.be/9kjGigqDz9g
