Chris Bledsoe Makes MAJOR ACCUSATION Against Top Podcaster?
Chris Bledsoe's appearance on the Sha Ryan podcast sparked significant discussion within the UFO community regarding a specific prediction about Easter 2026. The interview, recorded in late 2024 and released in early 2025, generated controversy due to questions about its editing and the precise nature of the statements made during the conversation.
Recent developments have raised questions about the editing process of this widely-circulated interview segment. The focus centers on a specific portion where Bledsoe discusses astronomical alignments and potential future events, with particular attention drawn to the technical aspects of how the interview footage was assembled and presented.
Key Takeaways
Post-production editing choices have created debate about the accurate representation of the interview content
The timing and context of specific predictions remain central points of discussion
The interview's delayed release and subsequent editing controversy sparked significant community response
UFO Witness Account and Media Coverage
Controversial Easter 2026 Statement
During a podcast interview in late 2024, Chris Bledsoe discussed predictions about significant events occurring around Easter 2026. He spoke about astronomical alignments, specifically mentioning the star Regulus appearing on the horizon near the Sphinx. Several prominent figures in the UFO research community have referenced this timeframe, including Lou Elizondo.
The interview gained attention when Bledsoe referenced a cosmic alignment predicted for Easter 2026. He described conversations with Robert Grant regarding the placement of a ruby between the Sphinx's paws in connection with these events.
Media Editing Concerns
Science Bob McGuire, an associate of Bledsoe, raised issues about the editing of the podcast interview. The episode took several months to release after its recording in September 2024. McGuire stated that separate segments were combined to create misleading content.
Key editing concerns:
Multiple camera angles were used in the final cut
Scene transitions occurred during crucial statements
The word "Christ" appeared during a camera switch to the host
According to McGuire, Bledsoe's original statements focused on:
A new understanding or learning
Separate discussions about hope and possibilities
No specific predictions about religious events
The podcast's editor was reportedly dismissed within 24 hours of the episode's release. Bledsoe expressed significant distress about the final edited version of the interview.
UFO Interview Editing Dispute
Claims of Interview Manipulation
The January 2025 interview between Chris Bledsoe and Sha Ryan sparked controversy when questions arose about potential editing manipulations. The specific segment in question focused on predictions about Easter 2026. Camera angles switched between wide shots and close-ups of both participants during a key moment discussing future events.
Public Statement by Bledsoe Associate
Science Bob Maguire, a close associate of Bledsoe, raised concerns about the editing process. He stated that Bledsoe expressed significant distress over how separate segments were combined. According to Maguire, the original discussion centered on concepts of new learning and understanding rather than specific religious predictions. Maguire noted that the podcast's editor allegedly lost their position within 24 hours of the episode's release.
Technical Review of Editing Methods
The disputed segment utilized standard multi-camera editing techniques:
Wide shots of both participants
Medium close-ups of Bledsoe
Medium close-ups of Ryan
The critical moment used a three-part edit structure:
Camera on Bledsoe stating "the return of"
Cut to Ryan completing the phrase
Return shot to Bledsoe's reaction
The interview's filming occurred in September 2024, with a release date several months later in early 2025. These extended post-production timelines differ from typical podcast editing schedules.
The Expected Events of Easter 2026
Star Regulus Position Analysis
The star Regulus holds significance in ancient Egyptian alignments with the Great Sphinx. Claims suggest this star will appear on the horizon directly in front of the Sphinx during Easter 2026. Astronomers have analyzed this astronomical alignment prediction using specialized software.
The proposed positioning remains unverified by independent astronomical sources. Current calculations indicate Regulus will not achieve the described alignment with the Sphinx during Easter 2026.
Government Remote Viewing Program
Several state agencies allegedly conducted remote viewing sessions focused on the Easter 2026 timeframe. These reported viewing sessions gained attention after astronomical predictions emerged.
The claimed government interest sparked wider discussion across media channels about potential significant events in 2026-2027. Notable figures in the UFO research community, including Lou Elizondo, referenced these dates in public statements.
Prophetic Event Interpretations
The original claims about Easter 2026 underwent significant revisions and clarifications. Initial interpretations suggested major religious significance, while later statements pointed toward broader concepts of new knowledge or understanding.
Key elements of the prophecy include:
Placement of a ruby artifact between the Sphinx's paws
Celestial alignments marking a significant transition
Potential spiritual or transformative events
The timeline specificity focuses on Easter 2026, though some sources extend predictions into 2027. These claims generated substantial discussion within spiritual and UFO research communities.
Examining Claims and Editorial Context
Sha Ryan Show Original Footage
The footage captured during Chris Bledo's appearance showed him discussing predictions about Easter 2026. The recording contained multiple camera angles, switching between wide shots and medium close-ups of both the host and guest.
During the segment, Bledo spoke about a star alignment with Regulus and the Sphinx. The discussion touched on government remote viewing initiatives and referenced Lou Alando's mentions of similar timeframes.
The key segment used three distinct camera angles, with edits occurring between Bledo saying "the return of" and the phrase "Christ" being completed.
Science Bob Maguire's Statement
The recording session lasted several hours, with months passing before its release. Maguire states Bledo expressed significant distress about the editing process.
Maguire's key points:
Bledo discussed "apocalypse" meaning new learning
The word "Christ" came from a separate conversation segment
Bledo spoke about hoping for Christ's return in different context
The editor faced termination within 24 hours of release
Production Alterations and Context
The footage shows specific editing choices:
Camera switches between statements
Multiple angle transitions during key phrases
Split dialogue segments
Timeline Details:
Recording: September 2024
Release: January/February 2025
Time gap: 4-5 months between filming and release
The editing style matched standard podcast production techniques, using multiple camera angles throughout the episode.
Public Response and Community Discussion
Close Associate's Perspective on Claims
Science Bob Maguire expressed strong concerns about the editing of Chris Bledsoe's interview on the Sha Ryan podcast. He stated that Bledsoe became distressed upon viewing the final cut, which took several months to release. According to Maguire, Bledsoe felt specific segments were spliced together to create statements he never made.
The production team allegedly faced immediate consequences. Maguire claimed the editor was terminated within 24 hours of the episode's release.
Viewer Analysis of Video Edits
The segment in question used multiple camera angles, switching between wide shots and medium close-ups of both participants. These editing techniques are standard in podcast production.
The specific clip shows visible cuts during key statements:
Camera 1: Bledsoe says "the return of"
Camera 2: Ryan completes with "Christ"
Camera 3: Returns to Bledsoe saying "yeah"
The footage contains earlier statements about 2026 predictions, astronomical alignments, and references to the Sphinx. The discussion mentions astronomical calculations and remote viewing activities leading up to that date.
Final Analysis of the Controversial Podcast Edit
The video editing in question shows distinct camera angle changes between Chris Bledsoe and Sean Ryan. The segment uses three different camera positions - a wide shot and medium close-ups of each person.
The specific moment occurs during a discussion about events predicted for Easter 2026. During this segment, the video cuts between camera angles as Bledsoe speaks "that's uh the return of" before cutting to Ryan saying "Christ," followed by Bledsoe responding "yeah."
The filming took place in September 2024, with the episode release delayed until early 2025. Science Bob McGuire states that the editor responsible for this segment was dismissed within 24 hours of the episode's release.
The original discussion centered on astronomical alignments involving the star Regulus and the Sphinx. Bledsoe's statements about 2026 focused on predictions of new knowledge and learning rather than specific religious events.
Key facts about the segment:
Multiple camera angles were used during editing
The word "Christ" appears to come from Ryan, not Bledsoe
The edit combines separate moments into one statement
This marked Bledsoe's first public statement on this topic
