BREAKING NEWS: New UAP Hearing Announced (May 2025)

Recent developments have brought renewed attention to the ongoing efforts in Congress to investigate Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). Legislative leaders have outlined a series of important hearings and briefings, drawing in key experts and stakeholders to address growing questions around UAP incidents and government transparency.

A tentative timeline for these activities is in place, with a sequence of events involving committee hearings and secure briefings scheduled in the coming weeks. These sessions are expected to explore the scope of existing investigations, involve prominent figures in the field, and address the hopes and challenges surrounding the disclosure of information related to UAPs.

Key Takeaways

• Congressional hearings and briefings on UAP are scheduled soon.

• Multiple experts and officials are participating in the investigation.

• The process aims to address transparency and expectations regarding UAP findings.

Briefing on Forthcoming UAP Investigations

Main Points from Anna Paulina Luna

Representative Anna Paulina Luna, working in coordination with the Federal Secrets Task Force, released the latest schedule for the next stages of the UAP (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena) investigation. She confirmed that the process will include several events:

Date Event Details April 29 Secure briefing with UAP researchers and officials April 30 / May 1 Roundtable sessions with members of Congress, subject-matter experts, and staff Week of May 12 Planned full committee hearing on UAPs (exact date pending confirmation)

The announcement credits David Grusch for his advisory role and recent onboarding, enhancing the investigative staff’s expertise. Coordination among Luna, Eric Burlison, and Tim Burchett indicates a focused and proactive approach to the coming hearings.

Further Information on the Federal Secrets Task Force

The Federal Secrets Task Force has set an active timeline for these proceedings, following their previous focus on other government transparency issues. Their mandate currently includes:

• Ensuring access to secure briefings (SCIF) for members and invited experts

• Moving swiftly to convene a full public hearing

• Engaging bipartisan participation across committees

Their current activities reflect an intent to collect direct evidence and testimony from key figures such as Lou Elizondo, Christopher Mellon, David Grusch, and the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). This cooperative effort aims to address both classified and public aspects of UAP investigation, while navigating the bureaucracy and security restrictions often faced in such probes.

The Task Force operates with the understanding that obstacles exist, including resistance from defense contractors and segments of the intelligence community. Investigators have been told to avoid deeply classified US technology programs, highlighting both the sensitivity and the complexity of the investigation’s scope.

UAP Investigation Timeline

April 29 Classified Briefing With Key Experts

A closed-door briefing is set for April 29, bringing together UAP specialists and relevant agency representatives. Planned participants include David Grusch, Lou Elizondo, Christopher Mellon, and officials from the AARO. The aim is to provide lawmakers with direct access to expert perspectives and classified details regarding current UAP investigations.

Attendees Expected:

• David Grusch

• Lou Elizondo

• Christopher Mellon

• AARO Officials

April 30 and May 1 Expert Policy Forums

On April 30 and May 1, a series of in-depth meetings and discussions will be held with congressional members, technical experts, and UAP policy leaders. These forums are designed to examine evidence, clarify research priorities, and address congressional concerns.

Discussion Topics:

• Recent findings and data analysis

• Policy pathways

• Agency collaboration

• Public transparency issues

Committee Hearing Targeted for Mid-May

A full congressional hearing on UAPs is planned for the week of May 12. The exact date is still being finalized and not yet posted on the committee calendar. Lawmakers intend for this session to publicly address UAP matters, question witnesses, and clarify the scope of ongoing investigations.

Key Points:

• Oversight and updates on investigation progress

• Testimony from key figures

• Review of classified and public information

• Next steps for the inquiry

Principal Figures and Parties Involved

David Grusch’s Involvement and Impact

David Grusch joined Representative Eric Burlison’s staff specifically to provide insight and guidance on UAP issues. His expertise became a focal point for the planning and execution of classified briefings and hearings, particularly with the Federal Secrets Task Force. Grusch is recognized for assisting with preparations for upcoming skiff briefings, where sensitive UAP data will be discussed among a select group.

Role Highlights:

• Advises on UAP inquiries for congressional oversight

• Participates directly in scheduled secure (skiff) briefings

• Acknowledged publicly by congressional members for significant contributions

Participation of Lou Elizondo and Christopher Mellon

Lou Elizondo and Christopher Mellon have been central to recent UAP investigations. Both were confirmed to be present in Washington, D.C., meeting with congressional staff and preparing to share their knowledge with lawmakers. Their expertise positions them as key witnesses and consultants in the planned secure briefings and roundtable discussions.

Name Background Current Role in Investigation Lou Elizondo Former military/intelligence official Prepping for classified briefings Christopher Mellon Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Engaged in roundtable meetings and briefings

Contributions from Eric Burlison and Tim Burchett

Representative Eric Burlison is driving the congressional inquiry, assembling a team that includes David Grusch and working closely with Representative Tim Burchett. Burlison and Burchett are committed to securing transparent investigations and claim to be pushing aggressively for access to physical evidence and classified information. Their collaboration is marked by a shared intent to break through bureaucratic barriers and deliver answers on UAPs.

Key Initiatives:

• Organizing skiff briefings and public hearings

• Coordinating with other oversight leaders such as Anna Paulina Luna

• Seeking increased access to classified programs and information

Representative Burlison frequently states his commitment to accountability and transparency, emphasizing that the investigative team will pursue UAP matters as far as possible within the current legislative framework.

Congressional Views on UAP Probes

Cross-Party Initiatives and Legislative Monitoring

Congress has marshaled a significant, coordinated effort on the topic of UAPs. Lawmakers from both parties, with representatives like Anna Paulina Luna and Eric Berles, are playing key roles in launching new investigative actions. These actions include a proposed schedule featuring a secured briefing with UAP experts and follow-up discussions among Congressional figures and officials.

Upcoming Key Dates:

Date Event Description Late April Secured briefing (SCIF) with UAP authorities April 30th / May 1st In-depth roundtable with experts and Congress Week of May 12th (tentative) Full committee hearing focused on UAP matters

Notably, the effort is described as the largest bipartisan investigation in this area to date. The pace is described as quick, with several high-profile experts and Congressional staff cooperating to accelerate information gathering and oversight.

Input from Jim Himes and Other Congressional Members

Interaction with Democratic leadership highlights the wide reach of these investigations. Jim Himes, the ranking Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, has indicated direct awareness of the new contributors and is familiar with specific allegations recently brought forward.

Other members, including Representative Berles, have expressed determination to move beyond prior disappointments and aim for transparency on the existence and study of recovered UAP materials. Berles pointed out the obstacles posed by both private contractors and elements within the intelligence community, citing bureaucratic challenges and guarded technologies.

Noteworthy Points from Congressional Officials:

• Recognition of difficulties in accessing classified “green” programs.

• Priority given to assembling expert-staff teams, including recent hires instrumental to the investigation.

• Continued emphasis on public disclosure and direct examination of potential physical evidence.

The Congressional approach is marked by high expectations, collaboration, and persistent questioning of those guarding sensitive information.

Anticipated Outcomes and Potential Hurdles

Objectives for Transparency and Fact-Finding

The goal is to push for increased openness about UAP matters through upcoming official sessions. There is strong intent among the investigative team to go beyond previous efforts by pursuing direct access to documented evidence, physical materials, and firsthand expert accounts. Members are seeking to examine any available recovered craft or biological materials, aiming to verify the existence and nature of these items.

The group is actively working with notable experts and advisers in hopes of gaining information that has yet to be publicly reviewed. An aggressive timeline and a promise not to repeat previous disappointments highlight the seriousness of these efforts.

Key priorities include:

• Securing direct briefings in secure environments with leading experts

• Reviewing confirmed government data and physical evidence

• Engaging bipartisan partners to support comprehensive inquiry

Difficulties Linked to Private Industry and Security Agencies

Obtaining information is complicated by major defense contractors and intelligence organizations that have held sensitive UAP data for years. Some entities within this landscape are believed to have direct possession or detailed knowledge of significant evidence. Contractors and security agencies have developed reputations for protecting such information and for warning against probing into highly classified experimental programs.

Stakeholders are aware that some programs, referred to as "green programs," involve cutting-edge U.S. technology that even officials are cautioned against investigating. These challenges stem from both direct resistance and reluctance tied to the need to safeguard technological secrets.

Primary complications include:

• Resistance from entities holding proprietary or classified materials

• Potential legal and procedural obstacles to information access

• Caution around protected U.S. technological initiatives

Barrier Type Example Actors Nature of Obstacle Private Industry Major defense firms Information gatekeeping Intelligence Groups Security agencies Classification and warnings

Issues Created by Governmental and Regulatory Structures

Navigating bureaucracy poses its own set of roadblocks. Onboarding key personnel and arranging official briefings have already consumed significant time and effort, signaling the complex layers of approval and oversight involved. The processes for authorization and scheduling can be lengthy, even with bipartisan support and focused leadership.

There is concern that these bureaucratic demands may slow progress or lead to further delays. Even with assigned timelines and well-defined objectives, each step requires coordination among agencies and committees, often accompanied by its own administrative procedures.

Main bureaucratic barriers include:

• Extended timelines for staff integration and approvals

• Red tape associated with sensitive material handling

• Multi-level coordination within legislative and executive branches

News Exposure and Audience Participation

Unique Insights from Capitol Reporters

Matt Laslo is recognized for consistently sharing updates from Washington, D.C. on UAP developments. Operating frequently inside congressional spaces, he has built a reputation for regular, exclusive coverage related to government investigations into the UAP issue.

Laslo has reported on recent movements, including the scheduling of a classified briefing (“skiff briefing”) at the end of April. His updates have featured discussions with lawmakers and staff about new hires, plans for hearings, and the perspectives of key congressional figures. He also interviews relevant officials and covers breaking news that provides the public with direct access to emerging information.

Key Points:

• Weekly, on-the-ground reporting from the halls of Congress

• Direct interviews with staff and officials tied to UAP oversight

• Announcement of timelines and events before official schedules are publicly posted

• Exclusive content that is often unavailable through other sources

Laslo’s coverage aims to inform and encourage public engagement, with suggestions to access more of his updates through his dedicated channel.

Opportunities for Viewer Participation

Calls for the public to take an active role are frequent. Viewers are encouraged to show support by subscribing to regular updates, participating in discussions, and attending live streams of upcoming hearings and briefings.

Ways to Participate:

Action Purpose Subscribe to updates Stay informed on timeline changes Join live streams Access real-time hearing coverage Engage in discussions Participate in open forums and Q&A Review committee calendars Track official hearing dates and events

These steps are recommended so the audience remains engaged during key moments, including committee hearings, briefings, and investigative events. Public participation is positioned as a way to maintain transparency and help push for further disclosure about UAP investigations.